The first time you go to court, what will the judge ask?
How do you need to answer that?
What do you want to say?
Don't worry, I've got you covered!
Here's a tip on courtroom language.
Please put it away! Check the information.
First, check the identity information of both parties. Plaintiff xxx, male, born on x, x, x, x, x, x
My address has changed, do you want to say it... Confirm! or
Changed, my address is...
After the TIPS judge announces **, he will first check the identities of both parties and the person entrusted to the litigant**. The parties need to state their name, gender, date of birth, ethnicity, job, residence, citizen ID number and other specific information.
Apply for recusal. Did both parties apply for recusal of the adjudicators and other relevant personnel in the case?
If you want to apply for recusal, I don't think you look like you're going to judge me to win!
To xx recusal (state objective reasons).
or do not apply for recusal.
The recusal system in the course of civil litigation refers to the trial system in which adjudicators or other relevant personnel, including judges' assistants, clerks, people's assessors, evaluators, and inquest personnel, are required to have a certain interest in the case or are close relatives of the parties to the case or the litigant in order to ensure the fair trial of the case.
Statement. Are the facts and reasons of the plaintiff's claim consistent with the pleadings? Or are there any changes or additions?
Judge, listen to me talk about this matter in detail again...
Our claims, facts and reasons are consistent with the pleadings, and are supplemented as follows
or our claim is specifically changed to: ·· The facts and reasons are changed as follows
TIPS litigation claim refers to the request of the party to the court to request the court to make a judgment, which can be read out in accordance with the complaint, but it is necessary to pay attention to whether the litigation claim, facts and reasons need to be supplemented or changed.
Reply. It is now up to the defendant to present his defence.
The plaintiff was just talking nonsense, and it was clearly like this that day.
I agree with the plaintiff's claim, but...
or I don't agree with the plaintiff's claim because...
"TIPS defense" means that the defendant may respond to the plaintiff's claims, express approval or disapproval, and refute or explain the facts and reasons on which the plaintiff's claims are based.
Proof. Next, the plaintiff is invited to present evidence, and please specifically state the name of the evidence and the content to be proved.
When I went to look for her that day, the aunt at the entrance of the village also saw her.
Judge, I have 1 copy of WeChat chat records, **3, which can be proven.
TIPS to present evidence, that is, to present evidence, there is no need to tell what happened, and the name, type, ** and facts to be proved should be stated to the court one by one, and a clear and complete written evidence catalog should be submitted.
Cross-examination. The defendant and the plaintiff are requested to cross-examine the evidence submitted by the plaintiff and the defendant, and make statements from three aspects: authenticity, legality, and relevance.
I swear to God that this evidence of his is false.
Confirm not to confirm authenticity, confirm not to confirm legitimacy, confirm not to confirm relevance, and add the following additional instructions...
TIPS cross-examination, that is, to explain and refute the evidence presented by the other party in terms of authenticity, legitimacy, relevance and whether there is any objection to the purpose of proof.
Arguments in court. Now that the court debate is taking place, the focus of the dispute in this case is the following points...
You touched your conscience and said, did you promise me at the beginning?
Regarding the xth point of controversy summarized by the court, we believe that...
TIPSThe court debate stage, the parties can focus on the focus of the dispute, comprehensively explain the legal basis of their claims based on facts and evidence, and argue and refute the other party's claims and reasons.
Debate is not a quarrel, and the content should be closely centered on the focus of the case controversy and the focus of the trial investigation, and be vigilant against the emergence of arguments unrelated to litigation and acts of personal attacks and insults under the pretext of debate.
Original title: "The first lawsuit, what should I say in court?" 》