A man in Henan walked into the police station to report that he had been forcibly indecent by a woman. This plot is already incredible, but when ** investigates deeply, it is found that the truth of the matter is even more confusing. The man Wu originally planned to take advantage of the quiet night on the street to enter a beautiful buildingVillacommitted the theft, but unexpectedly attracted a different kind of "whispering" - was caught red-handed by the hostess Ms. Jin. This one is outBurglaryThe farce of being accidentally grabbed by the owner turned into an unbelievable scene of a man being indecent by the hostess. What kind of misunderstanding and dispute is this, it is worth our in-depth **.
The man Wu wanted to make a livingBurglarySucceed. Seeing that there was no hope for money, he decided to take advantage of the night to "visit" the home of the homeowner, Ms. Jin. So, under the cover of night, he quietly tried to carry out his plan of theft. Such a picture seems to be an absurd comedy of black humor, which makes people laugh. However, while he was opening the box and looking for his belongings, he was attacked by the hostess, Ms. Kim. When Ms. Jin returned drunk, she found that there was a strange man in the house, and in anger, she unceremoniously pointed a wooden stick at Wu's back to retaliate. Wu was beaten in excruciating pain and had to succumb to the ground and be bound by Ms. Jin's ropes. This scene is like an absurd and confusing plot in a movie, which makes people stunned.
After Ms. Jin found out that she had encountered thieves, she did not call the police in time, but chose to deal with Wu in her own way. She forced Wu to have a relationship with herself, and this way of dealing with it is really unbelievable and incomprehensible. Ms. Jin used alcohol to strengthen her courage and used violent means to deal with herBurglaryWu, this kind of retaliation with ** behavior is really unacceptable. Her unconsequitted forcing men to have sex is a misdemeanor that she deserves to beLawssanctions. The conflict between the male and female protagonists turned into an absurd comedy** incident, which is embarrassing.
Ms. King's explanation for her excesses on the grounds of drunkenness is undoubtedly pale in comparison. Even when he is intoxicated, he does not excuse his violation of the bodily freedom of others. Ms. Kim's actions were clearly motivated by selfishness and revenge, and there was no way to conceal the nature of her illegal acts. Although the man Wu is suspected of burglary, he should never become a victim of Ms. Jin**. For Ms. Kim's act of retaliation,LawsA clear ruling should be made, and no accommodation should be tolerated.
*The way this case has been handled has attracted widespread attention. After the incident, ** through the understanding and investigation of the matter, he finally chose to let Ms. Jin go, but he willAttempted theftThe man Wu was detained. The fairness and reasonableness of this judgment have been questioned. The crux of the case is how the responsibilities and behaviours of both men and women should be determined in this absurd case.
Ms. Kim's attempt to justify her excesses on the grounds of drunken confusion is clearly untenable. Determination of women's responsibility in criminal actsLawsThey should be fair and impartial, and they should not be tolerated because of their gender. Ms. Kim's actions should not be condoned, and her illegal actions deserve themLawsSevere punishment. And for Wu, although heBurglaryattempted, but as a person who was **, he also deserved itLawsprotection and support. The detention of Wu may take into account his theft, but after suffering **, the treatment of him should also be more prudent and reasonable.
In this comical and absurd case, the dispute and confrontation between the male and female protagonists are ridiculous, but there is a right behind itLawsJust appeals. Whether it is the excesses of the hostess Ms. Jin or the theft attempt of the man Wu, they should all be subjected toLawssanctions and rulings. In the face of such a seemingly absurd but serious case, we should draw deeper thoughts and enlightenment from it:LawsImpartialityPersonal freedomand dignity should be fully respected and protected, and no individual action should be overriddenLawsAbove. It is hoped that in similar cases in the future, it will be better defendedLawsThe authority and impartiality of the company protect the legitimate rights and interests and personal safety of each person.