The dispute between the owner of Mercedes-Benz and the owner of Chery is still fermenting.
I also wrote an article a few days ago, and I also said in the article that I think that the Mercedes-Benz smashed other people's cars, and he went in completely to blame, and he deserved it, and we didn't help him wash it, but at the same time, I also questioned a series of questions about the Chery owner's lying about **.
But as soon as many people saw me questioning the owner of Chery, they immediately refuted me, saying that you questioned the owner of Chery, are you talking for Mercedes-Benz? I also said that I think there is a problem with the owner of Chery, does it mean that I want to say that the Mercedes-Benz man's behavior of smashing the car is right? Also said that I am not a Mercedes-Benz owner's water army, taking the money of the Mercedes-Benz owner? Wait a minute.
It's speechless.
Actually,I question that the Chery owner has a problem, which does not mean that I support the Mercedes-Benz man; I said that the owner of Chery should be held responsible for lying, which does not mean that I support the Mercedes-Benz man smashing the car. Is this logic so difficult to understand?
The Mercedes owner smashed the car, this is one line, the Chery owner lied, this is another line.
The Mercedes owner smashed the car and went in, he paid the price for his recklessness, which he deserved, so the line was basically finished. But at the same time, Chery car owners lied to mislead the public, used the old man to win the sympathy of the public, deliberately edited to mislead the public and the official, and lied to **, and finally ** personally released a recording to hammer them, this line, doesn't anyone need to be responsible?
Therefore, I can't think about the problem either/or, I can't think that I question the owner of Chery, that is, I support the Mercedes-Benz man, these are completely two different lines, and they can't be black and white.
And in fact, there are not only two lines of Mercedes-Benz men and Chery women, in fact, there is a third line, that is, Chery.
Chery, a company, also has many incomprehensible points in this matter.
For example, just recently, some netizens picked up this screenshot of Chery's 4S store:
In this screenshot, someone left a message on the after-sales service account of Chery, saying that it was recommended to assess the loss of 5001 yuan, and this account jumped out and replied, saying that the loss was to be assessed 5200, what does this mean?
As we all know, if the damage to other people's property exceeds 5,000 yuan, it can be punished, so these two people sang and sang in the comment area of the account, one asked for a loss assessment of 5001, and the other said 5200, what does this mean? Can Chery come out and explain?
Is this trying to press the 5,000 yuan line to give a loss?
I know that Chery said a few days ago that the loss assessment is 4,100 yuan, not 5,200 yuan, but even so, what is the matter with what Chery's people said in the comment area before?
And some netizens picked up a piece of information, that is, even if a new cover of Tiggo 5 is replaced, it will be two or three thousand yuan at most, plus the processing fee, that is, more than three thousand:
When the hood of the same car of some netizens was also smashed, their damage assessment was 500 yuan:
And there are bloggers who asked a professional car repair master, saying how much does it cost to replace the cover of Tiggo 8, and the master also said that it will cost about two or three thousand, but why does it cost more than 4,000 to assess the damage here at Chery?
Seeing this, many people may say that my above picture is fake, and Chery will not say that the loss assessment is 5200.
But in fact, many netizens have found this message, and they have also taken screenshots and saved it:
So many netizens have taken screenshots and saved them, how can I explain this Chery?
And what's even more bizarre is that when Chery's official account was live streaming somewhere, one of their administrators jumped out and said this:
What does an official administrator mean by that? Can Chery come out and explain?
Some people may say that this person is not an administrator, but in fact, when you take a closer look at the word "tube" in front of this person's nickname, you should know it. And some netizens found out that this person had interacted with Chery's official like this:
So what does this person mean when he says this? Can anyone come out and explain?
In fact, Chery behaved very intriguing in the Mercedes-Benz Chery owner dispute.
They either sent fruit baskets to Mrs. Xu's family, or invited them to dinner, either gave them a high loss assessment, or provided them with new scooters, I just want to ask, if the hoods of other Chery owners are also smashed, can they have these treatments?
And after Mrs. Xu's incident, Chery's legal affairs immediately came down and threatened to give Mrs. Xu's family a personal practice:
I just want to ask, if other Chery car owners also have traffic disputes, will Chery's legal counsel personally help them solve the problem?
In fact, Mrs. Xu's family has actually been cooperating with Chery before:
Therefore, in this matter, whether some of Chery's practices are objective or not, this actually needs to be explained.
At the end of the article, I still want to say that the Mercedes-Benz man smashed the car and went in, he deserved it, and I didn't wash the floor for him.
But the Mercedes-Benz man smashed the car, lied to Mrs. Xu's family, and Chery's sassy operations, these are actually three completely different lines.
The Mercedes man smashed the car and went in, and he paid for his actions. But Mrs. Xu's family lied to ** (it has been recorded by Sichuan Radio and Television Station "**30 points"), this is deceiving the society, and they should also pay for it. As a well-known car company, Chery has a series of operations, what does it mean, I think they should explain it clearly if they are responsible.