As one of the most powerful countries in the world, the foreign and military policies of the United States have been the focus of international relations scholars, political analysts, and global audiences. Historically, the United States has been involved in many international conflicts and wars, however, the United States seems to have always adhered to the principle of "war only, not occupation", that is, in the vast majority of cases, the United States has not chosen to occupy the territory of other countries. What is the logic and reason behind this practice? Is it out of moral self-restraint, or is there a deeper strategic consideration? This article will examine the deeper mysteries of this US foreign policy from multiple perspectives.
The historical background of the U.S. principle of "war only, not occupation".
Since its founding, the United States has embodied a cautious attitude toward foreign expansion in its constitution and policies. Although the United States has historically had territorial expansions in places such as Hawaii and the Philippines, these actions were more likely to occur during specific historical periods in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In the modern era, especially after the end of World War II, U.S. foreign policy has undergone significant changes. In the new international order established after World War II, the United States is more inclined to maintain its global hegemony through the establishment of international organizations, the signing of treaties, and the promotion of freedom**, rather than expanding its territory directly through military occupation.
Strategic interests and international image.
The United States' abandonment of encroaching on the territory of other countries is more based on the dual consideration of strategic interests and international image. First of all, with the advent of nuclear power and the development of a globalized economy, traditional territorial control is no longer the main manifestation of state power. The United States has effectively safeguarded its global strategic interests by deploying military bases in key areas, establishing military alliances, and controlling important international corridors, without directly occupying the territory of other countries.
Second, as the guardian of the global order, the United States needs to maintain its international image of "democratic brilliance." Direct encroachment on the territory of other countries will trigger widespread condemnation from the international community and damage the reputation and influence of the United States in the international community. By promoting values such as democracy, human rights, and freedoms, the United States seeks to project an image of a responsible great power that will gain more support and cooperation on the international stage.
Economic interests and globalization.
In the era of globalization, economic interests have become an important driver of state behavior. The United States has achieved the global expansion of its economic interests by establishing economic alliances and promoting liberal agreements. This diffusion of economic influence is often more effective and lasting than direct military control. The extensive global presence of U.S. multinational corporations enables the U.S. to maintain a huge influence on the global economy without directly controlling any country.
Other forms of military presence.
Although the United States does not directly occupy the territory of other countries, it has established a strong military presence around the world by establishing military bases, conducting joint military exercises, and providing military assistance. These military deployments not only safeguard the strategic interests of the United States, but also provide it with the ability to quickly intervene in regional conflicts if necessary. At the same time, by establishing military alliances with other countries, the United States can effectively expand its influence and build a stable international security network.
Conclusion. Generally speaking, the US policy of "only war, not occupation" is based on the comprehensive consideration of its global strategic interests, the maintenance of its international image, the maximization of its economic interests, and the realization of its military presence through other means. Such a policy not only reflects the complexity of international relations, but also demonstrates the wisdom and strategy of the United States to maintain its global hegemony through multiple means. In the future, as the international situation continues to change, the foreign policy and military strategy of the United States will continue to evolve to adapt to new global challenges.