The Huazhong Agricultural University incident fermented, and the crimes involving Huang Moumou may not stop there!
Nowadays, there is so much news that we have become accustomed to it. Yet, the stories of the 11 students at Huazhong Agricultural University still touch and touch many people.
Times have changed. In the past, it used to be said"Respect for teachers and education"。But now, all this is being called into question.
Who is responsible for this?
Huazhong Agricultural University, located in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, is a national key university with coordinated development of agriculture, engineering, literature, law, economics, management and other disciplines"Project 211"University. Whose shame is it that the president of such a high-level university is suspected of academic misconduct and fraud?
Huang was quickly informed of the results of the preliminary investigation into his alleged academic misconduct, but the investigation did not end there.
When a conflict occurs, the best PR approach for the unit is to publish the results as soon as possible to quell public discontent and minimize the impact. However, this is not necessarily the best way for victims to deal with the problem.
The victims of this accident were not only 11 graduate students, but also undergraduate and future HCA students.
Although Huang was quickly sentenced, it can also be considered"There was no follow-up"or"Follow-up is incomplete"possibilities.
Mr. Huang is very active in at least three areas.
The first and most obvious point is academic deception.
Eleven graduate students submitted a report of more than 125 pages long that included concrete evidence and** so that the school would not have to worry about conducting an investigation.
With the article's explanation of the falsified data, coupled with the laboratory's ** in front of everyone, the data is obviously fake. After all, we can't expect one brain to be able to do 11 experiments at the same time and then divide the results evenly among the 11 students.
In this regard, he remembered Mashu Mountain. When he wrote his complaint, he cited numerous pieces of evidence. Maybe there was too much evidence, maybe there wasn't enough evidence, so he was arrested.
Empathizing with whistleblowers requires courage, determination, boldness, attention, and the search for evidence. If there is not enough evidence, you risk being charged with defamation.
Secondly, Wong is suspected of misappropriation**.
From the information provided by the students, we found several doubts. For example, the students approached Mr. Huang for what he asked"Sample material"But when they bought it, the teacher told them they couldn't handle the materials.
Who buys the lab equipment? What are the dimensions? How much? None of these questions are clear. The most interesting thing is that the data is produced as usual without experiments.
What kind of person Huang Xiaoming is, he will have such a lot of energy, it is incomprehensible.
In addition, some students reported that not only labor expenses should be deducted, but also equipment that was not available in the laboratory should be reimbursed. Even if you arrange one person to do the survey, I am afraid it will be half the effort, and there is no need for investigative skills at all.
The third question is whether he deceived the state.
Once he gets the research topic, ** will give him financial support, but he just transplants some old data to the lab, and then modifies it slightly, and wants to get the grant with a fake document?
So, what is the credibility of the data in this document, and what harm can it cause if it is used as a reference for R&D?
According to the whistleblower, Dr Wong only needed to go to the library to find data, find some relevant articles, and then forge the articles to defraud the fund. Does this mean that many people can cheat research funds in this way?
Nowadays, many** belittle the excellent work of these 11 students, so why doesn't the state fund them? Is this fair?
If the president of a major national university has such an attitude and academic stance, how can he have any confidence in his son's future university?
Therefore, the victims in the Huang Xiaoming incident are no longer limited to school students, but are related to the country's trust in China's education and the children's reverence for academics. This overshadows the country's great cause of cultivating talents.
However, Huang is not the only enemy.
Students reported that Ms. Huang often returned to classes. However, as a school"Project 211"University, we have to pay a lot of money every year to study here, not to come to school"Water lessons"Target.
However, it was this confusing professor who got it"Outstanding Teaching Representative Award"and countless other awards.
It doesn't matter anymore. It is important to know what the criteria for judging a school are: is it that all teachers have a chance to win, or are only teachers in certain areas have a chance to win?
If so, how?
For so many years, the school has not even had the most basic experimental equipment, and it has never been inspected?
Huang confessed that he bought supplies and tools, but there were no other items in the workshop. In this case, why is Huang so confident? What does this mean?
If it's the school's fault, it's the school's fault, not just Mr. Huang's.
* Condemnation of academic fraud is not enough, and the authorities should conduct a more thorough investigation of Huazhong Agricultural University.
Our concern is that once Huang is convicted, it may not have much impact, but when ** subsides, will other truths emerge?