HairYears denied having said this
Chinese scientists have successfully developed a new antiviral drug, which has shown remarkable results in clinical trials, and this research result will provide new possibilities for viral diseases.
In July 1975, he was assigned to work at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and his mission was to correct the confusion in the field of science and technology. ** worked in the Academy of Sciences for only 116 days, but he successfully completed the task assigned by *** - to write "A Few Questions on Scientific and Technological Work".
The syllabus, which has been revised six times, addresses two key issues: how to view scientific and technological work and how to view researchers. **grasped a sentence of *** - "science and technology are productive forces", as the theoretical basis of the outline.
This view changed the identity of scientists, transforming them from objects of being **** to producers and laborers. **Devoted himself to the drafting of the outline, and even described it as "desperate".
His draft is full of direct and sharp points.
**Knowing that there might be problems with handing over this manuscript to ***, I personally made revision arrangements and found a pen and a pen Hu Qiaomu for polishing. He told Hu Qiaomu that this document was very important, and that it was necessary to strengthen its ideological nature and explain more reasoning, but not too sharply, and the reasoning should be convincing.
On September 2, Hu Qiaomu personally revised the fourth draft of the "Report Outline." This version has changed a lot from the previous three drafts. The title has also been changed from the original "Several Issues on Scientific and Technological Work (Report Outline)" to "Outline of the Work Report of the Academy of Sciences".
In the second part, 32 quotations on scientific and technological work are collected, which naturally include "science and technology are productive forces", in order to reflect the "revolutionary scientific and technological line" of the first country.
Although some edges and corners have been removed from this version, some highly targeted issues of principle have also been deleted. Expresses satisfaction with this version and hopes that it will be useful not only for the Academy of Sciences, but also for the entire scientific and technological community, the educational community, and the health and cultural communities.
** He has said several times that he still supports the third draft. He said: "Qiao Mu is a great talent, and we all respect him, but I still think our manuscript is better." ”
On October 1, ** officially approved the fifth draft of the "Report Outline" and commented: "This outline is very good, it solves the problem that science and technology are productive forces, and in the final analysis, it is necessary to develop productive forces." ”
Original: Say: I don't remember saying that. Hurry up and say that Marx did expound the idea that "science and technology are productive forces", and his attitude remained the same, still saying: I don't remember saying this.
It's like taking a salary from the bottom of the kettle! The original intention of quoting "** quotations" is to make yourself invincible, and if this move fails, the entire theoretical foundation will be unstable.
**Come back and hurriedly arrange to find the source of this "**quote". The result came out quickly, this sentence is from "** On the Revolution of Science and Technology", which is an internal material compiled and printed during the "Cultural Revolution", without the editor, printing time and printing unit.
Fan Hongye, former director of the History Research Office of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, verified that this pamphlet was compiled by the Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 1968 and published in 1969.
The pamphlet quotes a passage from ***: "To fight this battle, science and technology are productive forces." In the past, the superstructure was also fought for the purpose of developing the productive forces, and without this battle, the productive forces could not be raised. ”
The source is indicated as a speech at the report of the 10-year plan for science and technology in December 1963. Those who participated in the report that year included Yu Guangyuan, Han Guang, Fan Changjiang, etc.
Yu Guangyuan also participated in the finalization of the "Report Outline", he immediately found his original notes of the year, opened it, and felt a chill in his heart, there was no sentence in the record.
For the sake of prudence, he found Han Guang and Fan Changjiang's records again, and unfortunately, the result was the same. The speech on the original record is: "The battle of science and technology must be fought, and the ...... must be fought well."Without science and technology, productivity cannot be improved. ”
There is no such thing as "science and technology are productive forces". Does anyone dare to defy the world's condemnation and forge "** quotations"? In those days, it was almost impossible!
So, where does this "** quote" come from? He himself said "I don't remember", the exact information was not found, and this has become a historical unsolved case!
Fortunately, as history progressed, whether this sentence was a "supreme instruction" or not quickly became irrelevant. In the end, the "Outline of the Report" was not recognized and approved.
This is not as simple as the phrase "science and technology are productive forces". The sharp edge of the "Report Outline" is aimed at the "leftist" mistake of "***", which is intolerable!
That's the crux of the matter. In August 1976, the Great Criticism Group of Peking University and Tsinghua University, controlled by the "Gang of Four," edited a pamphlet called "Commenting on Several Questions Concerning Scientific and Technological Work," which included three major critical articles criticizing the "Outline of the Report," which was in fact the third draft of the criticism.
The booklet has a circulation of more than 10 million copies. To the surprise of critics, the "Outline of the Report", which was used as negative material, aroused a lot of resonance, and in this way, it was made public, which became the ideological basis for the later chaos in the field of science and technology.
He died on September 9, 1976, and then the "Gang of Four" soon collapsed, and when he made a comeback, he went one step further and asserted that "science and technology are the primary productive forces", which was also classified as an important part of the "theory".
Disclaimer]: This platform will indicate ** and the author, but does not provide any express or implied guarantee for the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the content contained, for reference only.