Regarding the titles of experts and scholars, many experts and scholars, whether they have quotation marks or not, their titles, in their units, groups, and collectives, such titles are an honor, but also a kind of recognition of their professional behavior, increasing scholars in their industry level with a high level of knowledge and academic attainments.
In the general academic level of discourse, the level of logic is higher than that of other people. Therefore, being recognized as an expert and scholar by the society and the public is a recognition and recognition of their academic level.
However, there are also some experts and scholars who do not have credible real talents, and their previous work and industry have some influence just because of the age or some standards of academic research they have previously engaged in, the number of articles published, and the grade range of the published articles. However, the continuation of work experience qualifications, their innovation and new doctrine is basically not much, therefore, at this time, to call experts and scholars can only eat some old books, and some people directly call themselves economists, which is often heard on the **.
The question is whether there is enough insight and a high level of cognition? It is higher than others and has been proved by subsequent practice that its cognition is indeed correct and verified, but there are also some experts and scholars who do not have more fresh insights, and their previous cognition is not enough to meet the requirements of the current technological or economic development. Therefore, we must look dialectically at the practical significance of the titles of experts and scholars.