With the announcement of the results of the 2023 Class 1 Constructor Qualification Examination, many candidates have expectations and doubts about their scores, especially those who have reached the passing line after a poor score.
Some students applied for score checking. Today, the Yunnan Human Resources and Social Security Bureau announced that a total of 236 applications for score checking were received within the specified time, reflecting the candidates' concern for results and trust in fairness.
The Yunnan Bureau of Human Resources and Social Security submitted these applications to the Personnel Examination Center of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and received a clear reply: the original results of the 236 applications were correct.
According to the marking rules, the multiple-choice questions are scored by machines, and the possibility of wrong grades is basically zero;
For subjective questions, the specific process is that each test paper is corrected twice by different markers, and if the score difference between the two people is more than 2 points, the test paper will be thrown out by the computer and marked by the group leader.
If it does not exceed 2 points, the computer will directly take the average score of 2 people.
In order to ensure the quality, no more than 15 test papers with an error of more than 2 points per person per day cannot be completed, and the marking work will not be arranged if the first time is stopped, and the second time it will be stopped.
Therefore, the possibility of errors in the test paper is extremely low, and this result may be disappointing for some candidates, but it also reflects the true significance of the score review from one side.
The purpose of the score review is not to change the original score, but to ensure the fairness and accuracy of the test marking. In this process, it is ensured that every test paper is fairly evaluated and that every candidate's efforts are duly recognized.
Although our review results show that the original result is correct, it does not mean that the result review is not valuable. On the contrary, it ensures the fairness of the examination and protects the rights and interests of the candidates.
For test takers, score review may not bring about a change in scores, but it is a kind of psychological comfort and protection of rights and interests.
Get more information about construction engineering exams in a timely manner