I was a little surprised when I first saw the hot search of "middle schools treat teachers and students differently from takeaway". But quickly calmed down, because it was inevitable.
For example, if you say that the teacher can order takeout, but the students are not allowed to order it, most of the people will resist. But if you "take a step back", the student point is okay and must go out to eat. Everyone agreed.
This time I ordered to eat out, and then there was the next evolution, so naturally it was not accurate. Isn't the connection between these inevitable?
Regarding the matter of not allowing students to order takeout, in fact, everyone has a number, so don't you just outsource the things in the canteen? Students are going to eat takeout, who will eat in the cafeteria? If you don't eat the canteen, how can the principal's seven aunts rely on the canteen to make money.
Some people say, who made the canteen unpalatable?
This is naturally the wrong cafeteria, to say that it is difficult to find two professional chefs, and it is not difficult to find two aunts to learn. If you don't do this, it's the principal who has eight aunts in addition to the seven aunts, and the water in the canteen is delicious, and you are full, who will go to the shop to take care of the eight aunts' business.
But the point is that this is obviously an unspoken rule, but they take it for granted.
Don't students have the right to choose what to eat and to eat?
There used to be, but now it's gone. As for the reason, as mentioned at the beginning, it evolved step by step. When schools are meddling more and more in the private lives of students, it is only a matter of time before what to eat.
They all ask students to write clearly about their parents' jobs and parents' incomes when they sign up.
And this subtle change will make people instinctively think that it is a normal thing, if the school can find a few more reasons, such as the takeaway is not clean, etc., people will feel more deserved.
It's a trap of human nature, and it's a trap of logic. Continue to "evolve", the school's hand is stretched out longer and longer, and it is time to start caring about the parents' sex time.
Do schools really have the power to deny students takeout?
Of course not, within the scope of the school's power, it should only be related to education. Eating is a kind of education, which is obviously already interfering with individual freedom.
To put it more simply, the teacher can ask the student to do the exercises, but he cannot ask the student to wash the car or wash the dishes for him, which is beyond his power.
The same is true for schools, where the school has the right to speak and can ask students to do what they do, which is the meaning of the school's existence. But in the private life of students, where does the school infringe on qualifications?
Whether to order takeout or not, what to order, this is the private life of students, and it is a matter of their own. Students are not in prison, so why can they only eat what is prescribed?
It's ridiculous and frustrating, and the situation is so ironic that some schools have banned students from ordering takeout and only eating in the cafeteria. Others are not very obvious, some force students to take takeout next to the fence and immediately devour it, and some even have to treat it differently where they are stored.
Some people say: There are many students and few teachers, it is not discrimination, and there is no need to care.
Treacherous logic, false equality. More or less, how can it be a reason to evaluate what should and shouldn't? It is true that teachers have a higher priority when it comes to learning for students and teachers, but is it also true when it comes to eating?
If not, how can the number of priorities be judged?
The number of professors and doctors is much rarer than that of the peasants, is it not that the peasants only deserve to squat and eat two bowls of rice? I read a German post before, and he has a sentence that sums it up very well, he said: I think an important criterion in developed countries is not only the economy, but also their respect for every kind of work.
Student is a kind of identity, but also a kind of profession. However, even if they are treated with the respect they deserve, some people are even depriving them of the right to choose what they eat. That's the difference.