The year-old Xiao Jiang used his grandmother's mobile phone number to register a game platform accountIndayssuccessivelySecretly used my grandmother's WeChat recharge to buy virtual currency to reward the game anchorTotalMore than 10,000 yuanAfter Xiao Jiang's mother found outsue to courtCan I get this tip back?
The court held thatThe Civil Code providesDissatisfactionA minor is a person with no capacity for civil conductAll civil acts made are null and voidMinors over the age of the age are persons with limited capacity for civil conduct, may independently carry out civil juristic acts that are purely for profit or civil juristic acts that are appropriate to their age and intelligence. Since Xiao Jiang is only youngyears oldIt is a person with limited capacity for civil conductThe frequency of transfers from itAmountClearly exceededThe child's normal comprehension rangeHis guardian was also unaware of thisLater, he refused to admit itIt should be found to be an invalid legal act
years onlyThe young Jiang is addicted to online gamesXiao Jiang's mother and grandmother accidentally leaked the payment password to Xiao JiangIt does not take on the responsibilities of guardianship wellThere is a certain amount of faultTherefore, the court ordered the defendant to return part of the top-up moneyTherefore, although according to the law, the act of recharging and tipping minors is invalidHowever, if parents do not guide and supervise minors in using the InternetThere is also a certain amount of responsibility.