Since the beginning of this year, the U.S. Navy and its allies have frequently conducted joint military exercises in the western Pacific region, and the security situation around China has become increasingly severe.
The United States has 11 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, while our country does not yet have a single one.
This can't help but make some netizens think that our country is not an opponent of the United States, but is this really the case?
The United States has recognized the strength of the PLA!
The strength of the Chinese People's Liberation Army has always been the focus of attention of military enthusiasts. According to the general consensus, the PLA's army and rocket forces are leading in the world, but they are slightly deficient in the air force and navy compared to the United States, and the number of nuclear ** is also lagging behind Russia.
However, these superficial figures do not fully reflect the true strength of the PLA. So, taking into account all factors, how many places can the PLA rank in the world in terms of strength?
And which countries are likely to defeat China?
According to the analysis of American think tanks, the strength of the PLA surpasses that of the US military, and this news has made some netizens rejoice, but more people are puzzled. After all, Sino-US relations have not yet improved, so what is the purpose of this move by the United States?
Previously, in order to strive for more military budget, the United States conducted a war game, and the PLA won, so does the United States want to repeat the old trick this time?
Recently, data released by Global Firepower showed that the United States and Russia are still firmly in the top two positions in terms of military strength.
However, the American think tank said that the PLA has surpassed the United States and Russia, which has aroused questions from netizens. But more importantly, shortly before this conclusion was reached, the US military suffered a major defeat in the waters of the Yellow Sea, which led to speculation and thinking.
The United States, backed by the fleets of Canada and the Republic of Korea, has entered the waters of the Yellow Sea to conduct military exercises without authorization, and further north of the Yellow Sea is China's Bohai Sea, which is very close to the Gyeonggi Stronghold, and this is a serious provocation to China's sovereignty and territorial security.
Although the US military thinks that it can be arrogant with a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, the reality has greatly disappointed the fleets of the United States, Canada, and South Korea.
Our naval forces have been spread all around their exercise area, and it is the Chinese and Russian task forces that are blocking the passage of the US ** fleet to the north to the Sea of Japan. And China's East China Sea Fleet is conducting military exercises in the south.
What is even more frightening to the US ** team is that the Shandong aircraft carrier squadron is already in full swing on the road they must pass, and the ** military base has also been closely monitored by our military.
The Rocket Force's many guidance ** targets, once the US ** team makes any radical moves, they will face the danger of instant destruction.
In the face of the tight encirclement of our army, the US ** team had to retreat in embarrassment, and this operation left a deep memory on the US army. Therefore, the conclusion of the US think tank that our army is invincible in the coastal waters reveals to a certain extent that even the US military, which is as powerful as the US military, is not sure to defeat our army along our coast.
As for the Russian army, the United States believes that they have shown themselves too weak on the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield and are clearly not an opponent of our army.
As the US think tank said, after a long period of accumulation, our army's comprehensive combat quality and equipment have been significantly improved. In the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea 70 years ago, the gap between China and the United States was so obvious that even the US military could not win.
And now, our strength has been greatly enhanced, and the US military cannot compete with us!
Although there are doubts"The battle will be won"Whether they are overconfident or not, they even think that the strength of the US military is far superior to ours. After all, we were deeply impressed by their bravado around the world, especially the outstanding performance of the US military in the Gulf War.
At that time, the US military relied on advanced equipment and tactical concepts to quickly defeat millions of Iraqi troops with almost zero losses, and their high-tech combat methods also deeply affected us.
However, we must believe that we too have the ability to win any battle, as long as we are determined enough and brave enough, just like the U.S. military. We must not be swayed by the doubts of others, but we must be firm in our beliefs, constantly improve ourselves, and we will definitely achieve it"The battle will be won"。
Some people always compare the military strength of China and the United States with the Gulf War, saying that there is a huge gap between the two countries. However, the Gulf War was not a direct confrontation between China and the United States, and a tough guy rushed into a kindergarten to bully a child, what is there to be proud of?
History tells us that, apart from the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, the US military did not even dare to cross the 17th parallel drawn by China during the Vietnam War.
Although the US military did not perform well in the fight against the Taliban and even had to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan, the gap in the number and quality of aircraft carriers does not fully represent the inferiority of our naval strength to the US military.
You must know that the key to modern warfare is logistics, if the battlefield is in our inland sea, our army can continue to receive supplies, and the rocket force will also provide support. In this case, even if the United States sends 11 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, it will be nothing more than a target for our military to practice.
Even in the naval sphere, our army is not completely backward. Taking the development of destroyers as an example, the comprehensive combat capabilities of our Type 055 destroyers surpass the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers of the United States.
Currently, 8 destroyers of this type have been commissioned in our country. Once the war breaks out, thanks to the strong shipbuilding strength of our country, the number of 055 destroyers will continue to increase.
However, given the impact of deindustrialization in the United States, it has become very difficult to increase the production of a large **. Some may point out that the U.S. military has sought challenges around the globe and has accumulated a wealth of combat experience.
In contrast, the PLA has enjoyed decades of peace, and if war does break out, is it possible that it will be at a disadvantage due to ill-preparedness?
In modern warfare, tactical concepts and technological skills are the key, not simply actual combat experience. The so-called actual combat experience of the US military may only be applicable to bullying weak and small countries, but in the confrontation between powerful countries, this experience is completely useless.
This was confirmed during the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the level of US military instructors. Under the guidance of US military instructors, the battle loss ratio of the Ukrainian army has surged from 5 to 1 to 7 to 1, and even 10 to 1 in some areas.
This clearly demonstrates the limited nature of the US military's actual combat capabilities.
Although the PLA has not participated in a single battle in recent decades, it has always maintained a high level of tactical thinking and combat capability in its protracted confrontation with the Zhu Ri and "Blue Army" units, which are known as the strongest on the surface.
Once there is a real war, the Chinese People's Liberation Army, armed with *** ideology, will be invincible. What is your view on this judgment of the American think tank?