When carrying out decoration, no matter which project is carried out, once a problem is found during acceptance, we usually point out the problem and ask the master to rework it. However, something happened recently that I found quite interesting. After the completion of the hydropower project, the neighbor looked at the situation of the house, but neither accepted nor asked for rework. This made the master feel very embarrassed, and in the end he had to ask the neighbor directly: how much do you want to deduct, if it is appropriate, so be it.
The neighbor was surprised when he heard the master ask this, and finally made an unexpected request. Actually, the master asked this question because he understood that the neighbors were not very satisfied with the hydropower project. The situation on the scene shows that there are indeed many water and electricity problems. For example, in the direction of the ground line pipe, the master sticks to the corner of the line, although it looks standard, but there are some obvious drawbacks. First of all, a lot of material is wasted walking along the corners, and secondly, there may be hollowing in the corners after the floor tiles are laid. In addition, this arrangement of the lines will also affect the placement of the dark baseboards.
Of course, the master also did a good job, such as after the socket line was completed, he protected the cassette to avoid the exposure of the wire, which played a positive role in the follow-up construction. However, more often than not, even if there is a problem, the neighbor should point out the problem and then both parties communicate to solve it. It's a bit strange that the neighbors don't accept or rework.
Therefore, the master mistakenly thought that the neighbor was going to deduct the money, and took the initiative to ask the neighbor. And the neighbor's answer made the master even more anxious, because he sensed that the neighbor didn't seem to be going to settle the bill. Therefore, the master promised that as long as the neighbor thinks there is a problem, no matter who comes to rework, the loss of rework will be deducted from the manual fee. This eventually solves the problem.
Looking at the whole situation, I feel that the neighbor's approach is a bit excessive. After all, even the best craftsmen will inevitably make mistakes during construction. If the neighbors didn't trust the master's craft, why did they choose to let him do it in the first place? Moreover, the master's craftsmanship is okay, if it is really poor, the neighbor is estimated to have replaced him in the construction a long time ago. What do you think about this?