Recently, India's performance in the United Nations Security Council has attracted widespread attention from the international community. At the meeting, the Indian representative put himself on the high plane of representing the 188 countries of the United Nations and "bombarded" the five permanent members of the Security Council. In their view, the Council is now "unfair" and does not represent the will of the 188 countries of the United Nations. However, the representative of India then stated that "it is not enough to expand the non-permanent membership of the Council". In other words, the Council's current approach is "unfair" because India itself is not counted. This statement can be described as a dagger of exhaustion, which not only highlights India's self-confidence and ambition in the international arena, but also exposes its urgent desire to seek reform of the Security Council and expand its influence. However, whether India's approach is reasonable and whether it can achieve its intended purpose deserves our in-depth analysis and **.
First, we must recognize that the UN Security Council is one of the most authoritative and influential bodies in the UN system. Its five permanent members play a pivotal role in the maintenance of international peace and security. These countries have been able to achieve this status not only because of their important position and contributions in history, but also because of their influence and responsibility in current international affairs. Therefore, any country that tries to challenge this system must be supported by good reasons and strength.
Second, on the surface, India is speaking for 188 countries in the Security Council, but in reality, this is nothing more than a diplomatic ploy by India to increase its leverage and influence in order to increase its position on Security Council reform. However, there are also obvious problems with this practice. First, with India's current strength, it has not yet reached the level of representing the 188 countries of the United Nations. Second, even if India does represent the will of these countries, it will not change the status and influence of the permanent members of the Security Council. Because the Council's decision-making mechanism is based on the unanimous consent of the five permanent members, not on a simple majority vote.
In addition, India's bombardment of the P5 at the Security Council has also caused controversy. Although India's criticism of the P5 reflects to a certain extent the dissatisfaction and demands of developing countries for the international order, India should also recognize that the role and contribution of the P5 in international affairs is irreplaceable. Moreover, India itself has many problems and challenges in maintaining international peace and security, such as border disputes with its neighbors and the threat of terrorism. Therefore, while criticizing the P5, India should also reflect on its own performance and responsibility in international affairs.
Finally, we should recognize that the reform of the UN Security Council is a complex and sensitive issue that requires joint efforts and consultation among all countries. It is not advisable for any country to try to change the status quo through unilateral actions or words. As an important developing country and emerging market country, India is playing an increasingly important role in international affairs. However, in order to gain more voice and influence in the Security Council, India also needs to strengthen its own strength and contribution in international affairs, and at the same time actively cooperate and consult with other countries to jointly promote the reform and development of the Security Council.
Therefore, although India's practice of making a big fuss in the Security Council has attracted widespread attention, its practical effect and significance are debatable. We should view this incident in an objective, rational and comprehensive manner, recognizing both India's self-confidence and ambition in the international arena and the challenges and difficulties it faces in seeking to reform the Council and expand its influence. At the same time, we also support joint efforts to promote the reform and development of the UN Security Council in order to better maintain international peace and security.
List of high-quality authors