In the 2025 Men's Basketball Asian Cup Qualifiers, the Chinese men's basketball team played against the Japanese team, which originally had a psychological advantage. The result was a big surprise, the Chinese men's basketball team lost to the Japanese team 73-76, and the brilliant record of 16 consecutive wins came to an abrupt end. This defeat is almost a big shame in the history of Chinese basketball, and it makes people worry about the future of the team.
Before the game, the strength of the Chinese men's basketball team had been controversial. Although facing the Japanese team, they once led 14-3, but in the second half, the Chinese team's attack stalled and finally missed the victory. Su Qun, as a senior commentator, made a profound comment on this, revealing the two major reasons for the defeat of the Chinese men's basketball team.
The Chinese men's basketball team failed to make full use of its internal advantages. Su Qun pointed out that the Chinese team obviously had an inside advantage in this game, but head coach Djordjevic chose to take the initiative to reduce the height of the team, resulting in the failure to form an overwhelming advantage on the inside, and finally unable to effectively limit the Japanese team's outside shooting. This tactical mistake became one of the main reasons for the defeat of the Chinese men's basketball team.
The Chinese men's basketball team failed to show an effective fast-break counterattack in the game. Su Qun stressed that if the head coach chooses a defense-based game, then a quick counterattack is particularly important. The Chinese team showed little satisfactory fast break effect throughout the game, in contrast, the Japanese team was adept at using fast break to score points. This once again confirms the shortcomings of the Chinese men's basketball team at the tactical level.
Regarding Djordjevic's performance, Su Qun admitted that his tactical mistakes led to the team's defeat, so his dismissal has become an inevitable situation. From the defeat in the Asian Games to the current consecutive losses to the undersized Japanese team, Djordjevic's coaching ability has been questioned. Chinese basketball fans have also begun to call for a change of head coach so that the Chinese men's basketball team can regain the pace of victory in future games.
Overall, the defeat of the Chinese men's basketball team is not an individual problem of the players, but more to blame on the tactical arrangement of the head coach. In the future, Chinese basketball needs to re-examine its own problems and make powerful adjustments. Dear fans, do you think Djordjevic is still capable of continuing to coach the Chinese men's basketball team? This may be a question worth pondering. ** People also put forward some criticism of the loss of the Chinese men's basketball team. Some commentators believe that Yao Ming, as a leading figure in Chinese basketball, has become a great shame in the history of Chinese basketball due to the chaotic league holding and poor performance of the national team under his leadership. Yao Ming's various management problems have been criticized as the culprit, leading to the darkest moment of Chinese basketball.
In the criticism of Djordjevic, there is a deep analysis of his coaching philosophy and tactical choices. Commentators believe that Djordjevic's tactics do not adapt to the actual situation of the Chinese team, underutilize the advantage of the inside, and ignore the importance of fast attack counterattack. This style of coaching failed to lead the team to the challenge at crucial moments, making the losing situation even more embarrassing.
Hu Jinqiu's outstanding performance was particularly dazzling in the defeat, and he showed strong individual ability in the game, with 23 points, 13 rebounds and 1 block in the game. His lone fight also revealed the plight of the whole team, lacking overall cooperation and tacit understanding.
In the context of the Asian Cup qualifiers, the frustration of the Chinese men's basketball team left fans disappointed and frustrated. Over the past 88
The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.