Recently, seeing that Mo Yan was sued, a group of public officials came out to defend him. There are two kinds of defenses: one is not to write about the specific reason, just because he has won the Nobel Prize, which is just a literary creation, so he reprimands the people who sued him for making a "farce"; The other is that Mo Yan's works strongly reflect the reality of social life, and suing him is the true reflection of reality in ** literature, which is unreasonable, in short, it is also a "farce".
For the former kind of strong words, there is no need to expose too much, everyone knows their domineering face. On the contrary, the second group thinks that Mo Yan's works reflect the reality of social life, and it is interesting to oppose the prosecution of him.
If you want me to say, if these Mo Yan insist on saying that Mo Yan's ** is a true reflection of the reality of Chinese society, then it is completely reasonable to sue him, and it is not unjust at all. Because since he thinks that his creation is writing about social reality, he needs to use the real reality to compare what he writes with what he writes, to see if he has smeared the revolutionary martyrs? Is there any glorification of the Japanese invaders? Has there been any distortion of the social reality of New China? If there is, it is a crime and it must be punished. Isn't that a no-brainer? As for the facts, shouldn't they be clarified through legal proceedings? What do you have to object to!
In short, whether Mo Yan is smearing reality, or reflecting reality, whether he should sue or not, Mo Yan and his faction cannot occupy both reasons and talk to themselves. If Mo Yan's works are really writing about the truth, then in order to find out whether Mo Yan distorted the truth of society, smeared the heroes and martyrs, and smeared New China? The court should have every reason to seriously accept the case, and at the same time hope that the court will judge the case impartially! Mo Yan was prosecuted