People's conduct depends on cognition, cognition is in, behavior is in.
This cognition is not knowledge, and the absence of cognition does not mean that there is no knowledge of something, but an attitude towards a certain idea.
We have different perceptions of two relative concepts or things, and naturally we will make different trade-offs. I also want the fish, and the bear's paw is also what I want, and some people will naturally take the bear's paw. It's not that they don't recognize the value of bear's paws, it's just that maybe fish is more important in their minds.
Perhaps there is no such thing as good or evil, at least in our eyes, the wicked do not consider themselves to be wicked. Standing in the position of different individuals, there is no good or evil, only trade-offs.
Some people always like to teach people to be good, so why choose "goodness", if you can explain it, in the end it is a trade-off. So you might as well tell him that good is good and evil is harmful. We always hate the wicked, so if there is enough **, will we be able to keep the good - in the face of those things we care about the most?
Empty preaching may be able to deceive those who lack knowledge, and when information is highly open, it is really annoying.