According to official reports, Cai Fang, chief expert of the national high-end think tank of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said in an interview with **: "The institutional arrangement is to adapt to the future population structure and make corresponding changes, and our social pension insurance system should adapt to it and make adjustments." According to the current pay-as-you-go, counting on who works and who pays taxes, how much money is there to pay how many people, then there will definitely be a gap in the future. First, the basic pension insurance should become universal (regardless of your contribution). We want to let no one in the future who is not in the country's basic pension insurance, everyone is there, as long as they are citizens of the country."
Really praise for such an expert. Such suggestions have also been on the hot search of major platforms, so let's see what the majority of netizens think.
Netizen "legend": The main thing is that the special people who didn't pay the money before and enjoyed special high treatment ate a large piece.
This is not the vast number of rural elderly, retired workers of enterprises, laid-off workers and other groups have been criticized for the pension multi-track system, although now the pension has been on the track for ten years, but the gap has not narrowed, and a considerable number of people do not have pensions. A netizen said: When the pension is really merged, it is the time when the civil service examination is over. This is a bit one-sided and absolute, but the meaning is very clear.
Netizen "Freedom": Adjust the pensions of certain groups to the same level as enterprises, so that there will be no gap.
That's not how you can fill the gap. Is it because there is a big gap in response?Are pensions high for certain groups?Merge, shouldn't there be less and less gaps? So what about occupational pensions?The proportion of enterprise annuities paid is less than 8 percent of the country's employed population2%。So what will happen in a few years?
Netizen "Smart": Now many companies are trying not to pay social security to workers, how big is this gap?Why not enforce it?
There are too many examples around, and the routine operations are: do not pay social security for you, nominally 200 yuan in your salary is social security, you choose to pay it yourself, but the boss will definitely not pay it for you;Ask you to sign a voluntary waiver agreement for various reasons and keep it confidential;They don't sign a contract at all, and they run away when something happens, for example, many migrant workers have encountered this situation.