U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken raised the issue again at the Security Conference in Munich from February 16 to 18"Food Theory at the Dinner Table"This statement shook the world.
Blinken reintroduced the "diet theory").
It's just that when the United States said those words, I am afraid that they would not know that they themselves would become a meal on the plate.
Blinken used the "table menu" to coerce countries to express their positions, and there were two more bad news in the Middle East, the United States and Israel have turned the world upside down in the Middle East over the years, and now they are finally going to be "shared".
BrynKenHeavyNewMentionoutricetableonFoodRationaleComment
At present, with the continuous rise of China, the contradictions between China and the United States are getting bigger and bigger, and the United States is not willing to give up its hegemonic status, so the contradictions between the two countries are getting bigger and bigger.
In the Sino-US dispute, the United States realized that it could not stop China's development, so it set its sights on China and wanted to "encircle and suppress" China from the world.
Each country wants to strike a balance between its own country and between China and the United States).
However, not everyone is stupid, and it is not a good thing for them to participate in the Sino-US dispute, and most people want to build good relations with the two big countries.
The United States is so outraged by this that it even ignores the principle of "sovereign equality", which has become international law in today's world.
When US Secretary of State Antony Blinken was asked by a reporter about the issue between China and the United States at a world security conference held in Munich, he began to "increase intensity."
"In the world, you're either eating at the table or you're eating at the table," Blinken said. He also said that the dispute between China and the United States, the United States ** also said the same.
Netizens were confused. ）
Although the United States has always been like this, when they put the word "sovereign equality" on their lips and reveal their identity as "predators", it surprised many people.
You must know that in today's world, a new international order has already been formed, and even the United States, when facing world affairs, has to fly the banner of "rules-based world order".
Such a blatant threat, completely contrary to the current rules of the world, will inevitably provoke the anger of all countries and make them lose their minds.
No wonder as soon as Blinken's statement came out, some people said that Blinken's words were as if they had come out of a horror movie, and they never thought that they would be called bad people at such an international conference.
However, while Blinken threatened other countries with the "food on the dinner table" theory, the United States did not realize that it was about to be targeted by people in the Middle East.
Middle EastAmericanAlreadybePushoncountertops
The Middle East has a very important position for the United States, not only because of its geographical location, but also because it is an indispensable part of the United States in maintaining its status as a "petrodollar."
The United States has always been concerned about the Middle East, and Israel is also an important pawn of the United States in the Middle East.
However, even if the United States is reluctant, the Middle East is no longer the final word of the United States alone, and the "quasi-allies" of the United States, including Saudi Arabia, are trying to make their voice louder.
It is difficult for them to stand alone, but the Arab world can be united, and no one can underestimate their strength.
Thanks to the will of the Middle Eastern countries themselves and China's vigorous mediation, Saudi Arabia and Iran, the sworn enemies of the Middle East, finally shook hands in Beijing in March next year, reaching an agreement to repair friendly relations between the two sides and further strengthen the cooperation between the two sides.
Subsequently, a "wave of reconciliation" arose in the Middle East.
Faced with this situation, the United States, on the one hand, is eager to broker a compromise between Saudi Arabia and Israel, on the other hand, hoping to gain a firm foothold in the Middle East through Israel, and on the other hand, it can also ease the contradictions between Saudi Arabia and Iran (Iran has always been an anti-American force, and Saudi Arabia's compromise with Israel is bound to arouse Iran's disgust).
Saudi Arabia saw that the United States had reached an agreement with Israel, and as soon as this incident came out, the local Palestinian military organization "Hamas" became nervous.
As a hardliner of the Palestinian resistance, Hamas is equally aware that Israel has been coveting Palestine and understands that Palestinian resistance groups cannot stop an Israeli invasion without the support of the Arab world.
Saudi Arabia is the leader in the Middle East, and if Saudi Arabia reaches an agreement with Israel, other Arab countries in the Middle East may come to an agreement with Israel, but it is difficult to say to what extent they will support Palestinian resistance groups.
In order to survive, Hamas did not hesitate to set off the Al-Aqsa flood, and Israel did immediately counterattack, and the contradictions between Palestine and Israel rose sharply, but it also brought the United States and Israel to a strategic stalemate.
Israel is carried away by hatred, and they will not rest until Hamas is completely defeated, so they have run wild in the Gaza Strip, causing countless civilian deaths, leading to a humanitarian crisis and causing widespread international outrage.
But the relationship between the United States and Israel is too close, and the only thing they can do is to pay for Israel, and such an approach will only lead to the collapse of the United States in the Middle East.
On 26 February, with the help of the United States, Ashtiyah delivered his resignation from the Cabinet at a meeting of Fatah, a legal regime in Palestine, at which it became clear that the situation in the Middle East was on the verge of collapse.
Blinken's voice of using the "food on the dinner table" to intimidate other countries has not disappeared, the situation in the Middle East is already precarious, and the United States is also in a difficult situation.
It is conceivable that the pattern of the Middle East will be readjusted, and the influence of the United States on the Middle East, and everything Israel has done in the past few years, will be incorporated into the Middle East plan.