Wang Xiaodong, who is from academia, recently caused heated discussions again in the recording**, and he seems to have questioned Lao Xiang again. **, Wang Xiaodong expressed his views on Hu Xijin's attack on the liberal arts secondary school students because of the SORA issue. He mentioned that the software released by OpenAI was very impressive, which also sparked a debate. Wang Xiaodong said that although he did not fully understand Mr. Hu's post, he seemed to disdain the speeches of the liberal arts secondary school students, and even directly stated that he was on Mr. Hu's side. Although both of them are liberal arts students and have no direct relationship with artificial intelligence experts, Mr. Hu is at least a liberal arts college student, and in the dialogue with the liberal arts secondary school students, he chose to support Mr. Hu. It is worth noting that this is not the first time that Wang Xiaodong has had such discussions, as he also scolded another scholar last year. Wang Xiaodong believes that when it comes to issues such as artificial intelligence and chips, we should not waste our energy on liberal arts secondary school students, but should focus on really in-depth discussions and research. He stressed that these complex issues require more in-depth independent thinking, rather than rash conclusions. In addition, he also criticized some big Vs for spreading rumors and damaging the image of patriotism under the banner of patriotism, believing that this is a kind of harm to national interests.
Wang Xiaodong pointed out in ** that for discussions involving artificial intelligence and technology, experts with professional knowledge and experience should be led, and liberal arts secondary school students with no relevant background should be allowed to take the lead in speaking. He emphasized the importance of knowledge and educational background as one of the important criteria for judging the credibility of an expert's statement. He also criticized overconfidence, blind ostentation, and rumor-mongering, which not only do not contribute to genuine academic discussion, but can also mislead the public and have negative consequences for the state and society.
Regarding the status of liberal arts secondary school students in academic discussions, Wang Xiaodong expressed his views. He argues that while these people may have their own opinions in a particular area, they do not have sufficient expertise and background in topics involving expertise and technology, so their rhetoric in this area is often unconvincing. Wang Xiaodong expressed disgust at the phenomenon of "self-exaggeration" and excessive boasting of liberal arts secondary school students, believing that such behavior is not only disrespectful to academics and professions, but also may mislead the public.
In **, Wang Xiaodong also talked about Sino-US relations and the development of science and technology. He said that there is huge room for cooperation between China and the United States in many aspects, and although there are differences in values and religious beliefs, they can still work together and develop together in the fields of economy and science and technology. He called on all sectors not to excessively incite antagonistic sentiments, but to look at the opportunities for cooperation between the two countries in a rational manner so as to promote the common development of both sides.
Through the analysis and summary of Wang Xiaodong's remarks in **, we can see his concern for academic discussions, professionalism and national interests. He emphasized the importance of professional knowledge and educational background as one of the important criteria for judging the credibility of an expert's statement. At the same time, he criticized overconfidence, blind ostentation, and rumor-mongering, arguing that such behavior is not conducive to real academic exchange and may also have negative consequences for society and the country. Throughout his remarks, Wang Xiaodong showed the sense of responsibility and sober-mindedness that a scholar should have, and his profound thinking on academic and social issues also inspired people.