The famous scholar Wang Xiaodong's recent recording of ** caused an uproar, and he suspected that he once again angrily denounced the celebrity Lao Xiang in **, which triggered people's deep thinking about the relationship and cognition between liberal arts secondary school students and artificial intelligence experts. Wang Xiaodong said in ** that although he did not read Hu Xijin's post carefully for the controversy about sora, he decisively supported Hu Xijin's remarks about the liberal arts secondary school students. He argues that in some disputes, the judgment can be based on the specific views of the parties, but in some cases, speculation can be made solely on the basis of the identity, education and knowledge of the other party. This incident can't help but remind people of Li Ao's famous saying: "Rotten eggs don't know if they stink until they are eaten, but they will smell them and you will know they stink", and it also warns us of the importance of carefully choosing our position in disputes.
Wang Xiaodong did not hesitate to choose to side with Hu Xijin, a liberal arts scholar, in the controversy between Hu Xijin and a certain liberal arts secondary school student. Although neither of these two is an AI expert, there seem to be some resonance and background differences in their remarks. The liberal arts secondary school student not only boasted of his superior ability, but also accused of boasting, especially in the remarks on China's scientific and technological development, which caused heated discussions. Wang Xiaodong believes that this situation reflects a state of coexistence of self-confidence and unconfidence. Standing in line without hesitation also seems to point to the high importance and recognition of knowledge background in the face of controversy. The background of education and education has become the basis for judging the correctness of a party's speech.
Expanding: Behind the showdown between liberal arts high school students and artificial intelligence experts, there are different views on the influence of knowledge background. Wang Xiaodong's choice to support liberal arts scholars reflects his respect for background knowledge on the one hand, and his recognition that the field of knowledge should be treated correctly on the other hand. This situation may reflect the difference in society's perception of the liberal arts and science and engineering, and how to better make position choices and judgments when facing experts in different fields. In **, the attitude towards the self-proclaimed attitude of liberal arts secondary school students has aroused widespread discussion, and it also warns a person how to better and accurately explain his background and position when expressing his views, and maintain rationality and respect in the midst of controversy.
In Wang Xiaodong's controversy over Hu Xijin and the liberal arts secondary school students, a key point that is thought-provoking is the background and position. Liberal arts secondary school students are keen to show their abilities and opinions, but they have encountered doubts and criticism from Wang Xiaodong and others. Is it the intellectual background and academic qualifications that determine whether a person's views are correct or not? In this controversy, the focus of the debate seems to be not only about the field of artificial intelligence, but also about the recognition of educational background and learning experience. Wang Xiaodong believes that the performance of lack of confidence and vanity will be exposed in the controversy, and this also reminds us that when expressing our opinions, we should be objective and rational, respect the other party's background, and avoid self-promotion and emotional speech.
Expanding: The contrast between background and position in the controversy brings confidence and questioning thinking. The self-esteem of liberal arts secondary school students contrasts sharply with the skeptical voices of Wang Xiaodong and others. Whether a person's point of view is correct depends on their background and position? This is also a question worth pondering in the face of controversy. How liberal arts secondary school students view the presentation of their own abilities and opinions, and how to balance the difference between background endorsement and insight, have become the focus of attention in this controversy. Perhaps, in this controversy, we can draw more rational, respectful and inclusive wisdom from it, so as to better deal with the collision of views in different contexts.
In Wang's analysis of U.S.-China relations, he mentions differences in values, the relationship between business cooperation and economic development. He believes that China and the United States have differences in values and religious beliefs, but they should be able to reach a consensus in the field of commercial cooperation. He likened the U.S.-China relationship to a joint venture, emphasizing the win-win situation that the joint venture brings, which not only improves economic efficiency, but also ensures the interests of consumers. This perspective calls for more pragmatic cooperation between the two sides around economic cooperation, and to avoid the negative impact of values and political factors on cooperation as much as possible.
Expanded: Wang Xiaodong's in-depth analysis of China-US relations is quite enlightening and warning. He used the metaphor of the joint venture to vividly illustrate the close ties and mutual benefit of the two countries in business cooperation. This kind of joint venture and cooperation not only promotes economic prosperity, but also reconciles the interests and contradictions of both sides to a certain extent. In today's context of globalization, the cooperative relationship between China and the United States is not only constrained by economic factors, but also carries dialogue and exchanges between different cultural backgrounds. How to find common ground in differences and seek reconciliation in conflicts may provide more enlightenment and ideas for the long-term stability and development of China-US relations.
Wang Xiaodong expressed strong opposition to the behavior of some Internet influencers who spread rumors under the banner of patriotism. He believes that this kind of behavior is the greatest danger to patriotism, and calls on the network management department to strengthen the supervision and restraint of such behavior. In the current information age, the spread of rumors has become a serious social problem, and it is even more painful to do evil in the name of "patriotism." Wang Xiaodong's remarks remind us that while maintaining the spirit of patriotism, we should also be vigilant against the harm of rumors, strengthen network management and supervision, and build a clean cyberspace.
Expansion: In the age of information, the spread of rumors and false statements has become a bad phenomenon. Wang Xiaodong strongly condemned the act of spreading rumors under the banner of patriotism, and he believed that such behavior was the greatest harm to patriotism. In cyberspace, the spread of rumors is often accompanied by a word carnival, spreading false information. In this process, how to effectively strengthen network management, maintain social fairness and justice, and protect the country's image and people's interests are all difficult problems that need to be solved urgently. It also allows us to ponder how to find a balance between free speech and information regulation, so as to maintain social stability and the healthy development of public order.