In the past, we often said that China needs to shape a more favorable posture on the Taiwan issue. There are two priority measures: first, to put the United States in the position of the main culprit in triggering the military crisis in the Taiwan Strait; 2. Take the initiative to emphasize the importance of "peaceful reunification."
For example, after Pelosi's visit, we launched a Jedi counterattack, which triggered the distrust of US allies towards the US, and the mainland took advantage of this to shape a more favorable strategic posture for itself, and the so-called "middle line of the Taiwan Strait" tacit understanding was broken; The latter is an important measure to counter the United States' emphasis on peace in the Taiwan Strait at multilateral meetings, because the Americans talk about "peace in the Taiwan Strait" mainly to use international ** to prevent Chinese mainland from launching military action, and we take the initiative to talk about "supporting peaceful reunification", but it proves that we attach more importance to peace in the Taiwan Strait, and there are more deep meanings, which we can talk about later.
At the just-concluded Munich Security Conference, Wang Yi began to release some new signals worthy of attention, which we can call the king bomb-level counterattack. Wang Yi's more innovative remarks are: To uphold the one-China principle, we should support China's peaceful reunification. If we want to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, we must resolutely oppose it.
It should be noted that Chinese mainland used to only mention the international community's support for "one China", but now it is asking for support for "peaceful reunification", which is a huge change and very skillful.
You may ask: What is the difference between supporting one China and supporting "peaceful reunification"? Of course there is a difference. The former emphasizes that the Taiwan issue is China's internal affair and that China has the right to use any means, including force, to achieve real-world reunification. The latter not only insisted on its own power, but also expressed Chinese mainland's willingness to prefer "peaceful reunification" and wanted to mention the support of the international community.
This has three meanings at present: First, Chinese mainland does not have the imminent will to launch "armed reunification" with Taiwan; Second, Chinese mainland prefers to achieve reunification through peaceful means; 3. It is precisely "** and its supporters" that really trigger the military crisis in the Taiwan Strait.
Think about it again, who is now hyping up that Chinese mainland will take military action against Taiwan by 2027? The United States, of course. Who prevents the peaceful reunification of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is, of course, the anti-China forces and "** elements" in the United States who oppose changing the status quo; To maintain peace in the Taiwan Strait, it is necessary to oppose "** is equivalent to "opposing "** with peace in the Taiwan Strait, and will also push the *** authorities who do not give up" party platform to the position of the biggest variable that will cause a military crisis in the Taiwan Strait.
A potential "Taiwan Strait crisis" is a major event that the international community is most worried about at present, because it involves major interests. Therefore, Wang Yi is tantamount to telling European and American politicians that only by supporting China's peaceful reunification and clearly standing up "against **" is the most in line with its own interests, and Chinese mainland is more willing to see peace in the Taiwan Strait than the West.
If we research, we can find that the phrase "incompatible with peace in the Taiwan Strait" originated from the third article on Taiwan in 2022, and linking "upholding one China" with supporting peaceful reunification is definitely an innovative ** war technique.
In response to the international community's appeal for a peaceful settlement of the cross-strait issue in recent years, it has also clarified the possibility that the mainland may easily use force. More crucially, Chinese mainland has emphasized that the two sides of the strait must eventually be reunified, and there is only one such outcome.
"Supporting China's peaceful reunification" also has a major role, that is, to let those Western countries that talk every day not only pay lip service to the statement of "not supporting", but to have practical actions of "opposition".
For Chinese mainland, the most important strategic task at present is development, and a peaceful situation in the Taiwan Strait is needed, but it is all the more necessary for us to create a more favorable international environment for future reunification. After Lai Qingde came to power, he would be able to discover that all the "opposition to independence and promotion of reunification" on the mainland would be carried out under the banner of "peaceful reunification," and this would make the "** elements more and more desperate." List of high-quality authors