Hello everyone.
The word "two dealers" is not very correct when you hear it;
But you may not expect that it is actually involved with state-owned enterprises.
Recently, the remarks of Yao Yang, former president of the National School of Development of Peking University, have detonated heated discussions on the Internet.
In a ** interview, Professor Yao directly and boldly pointed out:
Nowadays, many state-owned enterprises are "second-hand dealers", taking projects and not working, subcontracting to private enterprises, and charging 7% of the handling fee on the ground.
Moreover, Professor Yao Yang not only criticized the behavior of state-owned enterprises for not working on projects and changing hands to make the difference;
It also sharply exposed the deep structural problems between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises.
Everyone also fried the pot for a while, and some said that 7% was a conscience price;
In fact, it's 10%, or even 15%;
What's even more ruthless is that there are places where it can go up to 20%.
Speaking of which, it is estimated that many partners should have a deep understanding:
Many private enterprises finally got a little opportunity, but the final income was pitiful.
The bosses were even more exhausted, and some even lost their wives and soldiers.
But then again, why can state-owned enterprises play so much?
Professor Yao also gave a reasoned and well-founded analysis:
First, because the local government wants to save worry, in order to avoid responsibility, it directly gives the project to the state-owned enterprise.
On the other hand, state-owned enterprises are backed by big trees to enjoy the shade, and banks are more willing to lend money to state-owned enterprises.
As a result, private enterprises are naturally in a weak position in terms of resource allocation, and they are often forced to take over the "leftovers" of state-owned enterprises.
In the long run, this will lead to resource skews and market distortions.
Private enterprises are always muddy and thankless in the race of resource allocation.
But it's not just engineering;
State-owned enterprises in the financial market are also playing the game of subcontracting;
With the low-cost funds of the central bank, he turned around and lent to private enterprises at high interest rates;
Peel off another layer of the small boss's money.
However, Professor Yao's remarks did not just pour cold water on state-owned enterprises;
It has also sounded the alarm for the current situation of private enterprises.
At this moment, the hardships of private enterprises are not only their own suffering, but also the hidden worries of the development of the whole society.
You must know that private enterprises account for half of the country's economy.
If the private economy collapses, then wages, innovation, taxes, employment, and the number of enterprises ......
These pillars of society will also be crumbling.
Such a status quo puts a heavy burden on the survival of private enterprises;
But if you don't do this work, private enterprises won't be able to survive, isn't this also forced?
However, don't look at this matter, only private enterprises are miserable;
In the final analysis, we ordinary people also suffered.
Those tofu scum projects must be indispensable to the "second-hand dealers" of state-owned enterprises.
Therefore, this matter is not only the business of private enterprises, but also the business of the country, and it is the business of each of us.
But we can't just look at the superficial phenomenon, Professor Yao's words just remind us of the deeper problem:
How can the role of state-owned enterprises be merely subcontractors?
They are supposed to be the leaders of economic development and the solid backing of people's livelihood services.
If such "second-traders" become the norm;
State-owned enterprises will lose the source of innovation, become unable to take a step, and eventually become an obstacle to development.
State-owned enterprises should regain their national responsibility as "national enterprises";
It should not be an unfair force in the market.
The private economy is the source of social wealth;
They act as the backbone of half the sky – responsible for more than half of tax revenue and GDP, providing the vast majority of jobs, and guaranteeing the vitality of innovation.
Such power, subject to such unfair rules of the game, is indeed a huge waste of the state.
Only by facing the problem head-on can we find a solution.
Only fair competition can fully stimulate the vitality of the market;
This is not only the salvation of private enterprises, but also the responsibility of the whole society.
Professor Yao Yang's bold mantra was like a resounding slap in the face, slapping those "second-traders" state-owned enterprises in the face.
Professor Yao not only calls for fairness and justice in the market and speaks for private enterprises;
This is also to stimulate turbidity and promote the healthy development of the economy.
I really should give credit to Professor Yao;
Because he not only justifies the name of private enterprises, but also shouts for social justice.