Ukraine's "mess", it's time to take it, compared to the dilemma of the United States, Britain seems to be much tougher, directly gave orders to NATO, what did it say, and let the 31 NATO countries collectively be silent?
1. What the United States did not dare to say, Britain said
According to the reportA few days ago, Britain put forward a "proposal" to NATO, requiring the formation of an expeditionary force, sending troops to Ukraine, and establishing a no-fly zone over the region to help Ukraine reverse its decline and rebuild its air defense.
According to the plan, NATO troops, which are holding large-scale exercises, have in fact completed their assembly and mobilization, and can next send more mobile field troops to Ukraine from two directions, Romania and Poland.
From Kyiv to the Dnieper, from Mykolaiv to Odessa, up to the entire Ukrainian deep zone, it will be under the command of NATO field army units, thereby liberating the main forces of Ukraine from the front.
In addition, in order to avoid the Russian Aerospace Forces' strikes on Ukraine's deep fortifications, NATO must assume the heavy responsibility of Ukraine's air defense, cover Ukraine's full resumption of military production, and regain the ability to fight a protracted war with the Russian army.
Of course, defense alone is not enough, NATO will concentrate Romanian troops, as well as Moldovan troops, to strike at the German-left regionUnits belonging to the 14th Army of the Russian Army stationed in the area will become key targets.
Again using the military forces deployed in Northern Europe to contain Russia's main forces in the north, especially strengthening the military deployments of Norway and Finland, can form an obvious strategic deterrent to the direction of St. Petersburg in Russia.
2. Finland has become a "sharp sword" for NATO
It is worth noting that since joining NATO, Finland's military development seems to have entered the fast lane.
At the end of last year,Finnish Defense Minister Antti Heikänen and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken signed a Defense Cooperation Agreement under which Finland will open 15 military bases for the use of the U.S. military.
At the same time, Finland also agreed that the US military would store ammunition next to its northern railway corridors, which are connected to the Russian border, and this move is obviously aimed at helping the US military form a "crushing" advantage over Russia in the military field.
Finland** also said that after the signing of this agreement, the US military will have the right to be permanently stationed in Finland and can also develop corresponding exercise plans.
After successfully "joining the treaty", Finland also summoned the armies of many countries and gathered about 20 ships to carry out a large-scale military exercise, aiming to improve the joint combat capability of the navy and improve the ability to support the "host".
The West says it demonstrates Finland's determination to "defend NATO's security." And such a change will inevitably lead to changes in relations between Russia and Finland, as well as a border crisis.
This further exacerbates Russia's hostility towards NATO, leading it to increase the deployment of its nuclear forces in the Baltic region, which in turn increases the risk of a nuclear conflict, the analysis notes.
3. The UK gives a deadline: before May this year
But this is not something that Britain will worry about.
At that time, NATO will comprehensively increase Ukraine's military assistance, and will also establish military factories in Ukraine, use Ukraine's equipment resources to produce a large number of first-class ammunition, and support Ukraine in attacking targets in Russia.
The above-mentioned NATO field army will not directly participate in the confrontation with the Russian army, and is mainly responsible for the defense of Ukraine's rear.
After that, it will also take over the border areas between Ukraine and Belarus to form a multifaceted strategic deterrent against Belarus and contain Russia on the other hand.
The UK said it was working on a tight schedule and was proposing to complete all preparations and start operations in May 2024, and was currently trying to persuade NATO members to agree to the plan.
Because, once the Ukrainian defense line is defeated, it will be directly killed in front of the NATO field army, which can destroy Russia's offensive ability, and at the same time, it can also liberate more Ukrainian troops to put into the front line.
In the end, the Russian army's ability to continue to attack will no longer exist, and NATO will also take over the Ukrainian army, finally ending the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and achieving a 38th-line battlefield ceasefire.
In this case, some people are curious, the real hole card of the Russian army is nuclear **, NATO is so provocative, isn't it afraid to eat nuclear bombs?
4. In the direction of the Black Sea, the US military has already entered the war?
In the eyes of the UK, although Russia has the world's largest nuclear arsenal, this has not affected NATO's eastward expansion, let alone the United States and NATO's continued support for Ukraine.
Although the United States has the world's second nuclear arsenal, it has not affected its defeat in Vietnam, Afghanistan and other battlefields, and even in the current situation in the Middle East, the US military is still languishing.
That is to say,Britain believes that even though nuclear weapons have a tough strike capability, no one dares to use them lightly, and the current battlefield still relies on traditional military strength.
It has been revealed that, in fact, the US reconnaissance and strike force has already entered the war and has established a complete set of strike systems in the Black Sea and Crimea regions.
The US think tank said that in the context of global turmoil, the US military has long been ready for combat, for example, in Eastern Europe, it has established the Patriot air defense system, the land-based Zeus system and the THAAD system.
However, Russia is not a "soft persimmon" that can be manipulated by others, Russian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Industry and Industry Nice Manturov said that in the next few years, the Russian army has new armament plans to launch.
Putin and Shoigu have already ordered to continue to increase the production of artillery, drones, tanks and armored vehicles.
For Russia, the most difficult problem now is that after Ukraine fully turns to the West, there is not much strategic depth left for Russia to accumulate for many years.
In the new year, the United States increased military investment, Congress passed the $886 billion defense spending bill, and at the same time, Russia was not to be outdone, passing a $160 billion military budget.
It can be said that the United States and Russia are currently evenly matched, and if they insist on going to war, they can only lose in the end.