With the blowing of the spring breeze, the spring is getting stronger and everything is recovering. However, in this season full of vitality, a proposal by Academician Pan Fusheng, a deputy to the National People's Congress, was as biting as a cold wind, arousing widespread concern and heated discussions in the society. He proposed to eliminate the concept of first degree in resumes, aiming to break the inherent concept of "school-only origination" and promote educational equity and employment equality. When I heard this, my heart was filled with joy and joy, what a good welfare policy this should be?
However, when I saw the comments of netizens, this suggestion was like a resounding slap in the face, hitting those who have long adhered to the "school-only theory". Some netizens said that for many powerful people, the future of their children is not worried, and it is even more difficult for those who want to get ahead with their academic qualifications.
The release of any policy has two sides, for different groups of people, the views are naturally very different, for the low education, the later can be upgraded to the academic background of the friends, it is natural to like to see, and for the highly educated talents, undoubtedly to them to increase more employment difficulties and hit them have been proud of the high education.
I want to say that no matter what the academic background, ability is the most important, if you have a tenacious heart, and good behavior habits, in the face of any problem can be easily solved, in the face of the present, we should enhance the children's frustration, and exercise a strong heart, pay attention to the children's physical and mental health. So, what does this suggestion of Academician Pan Fusheng mean? Can it really change the existing education and employment environment? What should we make of the social repercussions of this proposal? Next, let's dive into the problems behind this. 
First of all, Academician Pan Fusheng suggested that laws and policies should be improved. This is undoubtedly a positive move, because only sound laws and policies can provide a strong guarantee for educational equity and employment equality. However, we must also recognize that it is not enough to rely on regulations and policies alone. As some netizens said: "The only fair screening method has been canceled", if the implementation of laws and policies is not effective, then the so-called fairness and equality will become a castle in the air. Therefore, we need to pay more attention to the implementation and effectiveness of regulations and policies while formulating them, so as to ensure that each policy can truly take root.
Secondly, Academician Pan Fusheng proposed that the talent evaluation criteria should be ability-oriented. This is a very reasonable suggestion, because a person's ability is the key factor that determines whether they are competent for the job. However, we should also note that the implementation of this recommendation is not easy. After the elimination of the "concept of first degree", how to scientifically and fairly evaluate a person's ability has become an urgent problem to be solved. We need to establish a more complete talent evaluation system to ensure the objectivity and fairness of the evaluation results. At the same time, we should also be aware that the implementation of this recommendation may have a certain impact on the interests of some people, so it is necessary to properly handle the interests of all parties.
In addition, Academician Pan Fusheng also suggested strengthening supervision and inspection to clean up and correct unhealthy tendencies. This is undoubtedly a very important initiative, because only by strengthening the supervision and inspection in the field of education and employment can we ensure the effective implementation of various policies and the smooth implementation of various tasks. However, we also need to recognize that inspections are not a panacea. There are loopholes and shortcomings in any system, and there will always be people who will take advantage of these loopholes. Therefore, we need to pay more attention to the improvement and innovation of the system while strengthening supervision and inspection, and fundamentally solve the problem.
Finally, Academician Pan Fusheng emphasized the need to strengthen publicity and guidance, so that party and government organs, public institutions, and state-owned enterprises can take the lead. This is undoubtedly a very important measure, because only by strengthening publicity and guidance can we raise the awareness and attention of the whole society to educational equity and employment equality. At the same time, we must also realize that propaganda and guidance is not a matter that can be achieved overnight, and requires long-term efforts and persistence. We need to continue to strengthen the publicity and promotion of education equity and employment equity through various channels and methods, so that more people can understand and realize the importance and urgency of this issue. Regarding Academician Pan Fusheng's suggestion, netizens expressed their opinions and opinions. Some people believe that this proposal will help to break the stereotype of "school-only origination" and promote educational equity and employment equity; There are also concerns that the implementation of this recommendation may lead to new inequities and discrimination. All these views and viewpoints are reasonable, reflecting the concern and thinking of all sectors of society on this issue.
However, we must also recognize that no reform can be achieved overnight and requires long-term efforts and persistence. Although Academician Pan Fusheng's suggestion is of positive significance, it also requires us to continue to explore and improve in practice. We need to gradually break the inherent concept of "school-only origination" and promote educational equity and employment equality through continuous efforts and attempts. 
In short, Academician Pan Fusheng's suggestion has aroused widespread social attention and heated discussions. Although this suggestion is challenging and difficult, it also points out a direction and goal for us. We need to gradually promote the realization of educational equity and employment equality through continuous efforts and exploration. At the same time, we should also maintain a rational and objective attitude towards the various social repercussions and controversies caused by this proposal. After all, reform is a long and complex process that requires our joint efforts and wisdom.