In recent years, Xiamen, Fujian, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Bozhou, Anhui and other places have successively implemented the recruitment system of teacher employment, that is to say, the recruitment of new teachers is no longer included in the staff, but the same as working in the company, the implementation of contract management. This operation makes those who are preparing to take the teacher exam suddenly at a loss, for fear that even if they try their best to get in, they will eventually be "optimized" or fail the exam at all.
So will the statement that teachers quit their careers become a national implementation policy? He believes that no, especially for teachers in compulsory education, will not change the existing education policy.
First of all, whether it is a contract system or a preparation, its salary is allocated by the first financial appropriation, for economically developed cities, the income of teachers has always been middle and upper-class, even if it is a recruitment system of teachers, from the point of view of saving expenses, the management of teacher contract system alone can not solve much financial pressure. From the perspective of optimizing the education system, poor areas will not increase the salary investment in teacher recruitment because of this, and they will also be unable to recruit good teachers. On the contrary, if the appointment system is implemented for teachers, and the teaching post is evaluated as an ordinary position, it may also cause the examination to spend a lot of time considering how to promote and raise the salary, ignoring the quality of teaching, which will have a negative effect.
So why do some regions still want to implement the teacher appointment system? It seems that Shi Erjun is actually to prevent teachers from lying flat and keep their iron jobs for life, which is one of the biggest reasons why everyone wanted to "join the editor" beforeHowever, in the employment model, although the contract renewal is basically fine, once the teacher violates the teacher's ethics, makes mistakes, and has low energy efficiency, the difficulty and process of being optimized in the two models are completely different.
Of course, the deeper consideration is unknown, and everyone thinks that it is a good thing or a bad thing for teachers to quit their careers? What will be the next position that may be transferred from the editor?