The reason why I think that Western pseudo-historiography is completely nonsense is because their arguments do not conform to the general laws of the spread of human civilization.
Civilization has two important carriers, language and religion, whether a civilization is strong or advanced, the most important thing is its language or religion dare to spread.
The Roman Empire left deep linguistic and religious traces during its greatest power, and this example of the spread of civilization is more eloquent and powerful than any historical record.
The diffusion of civilization must be accompanied by the diffusion of language, if the civilization in the east of the continent is higher than that in the west, there must be a process of continuous transmission of language or religion from the east to the west, but this process did not happen, and the Chinese culture only affected Korea and Japan further east, and there was no example of transmission to the west.
If there is any obvious sign of a strong or advanced civilization, it must be that its own language has been widely disseminated, and the Russian language in the Soviet era, and the English language in the current era, are the true projections of the influence of a civilization. Without the transmission of language, there can be no transmission of culture.
In history, there was no Confucian state in the west, and there was no Chinese-speaking nation. At first glance, it doesn't look like it.
If Chinese culture is the first in the world, first of all, Chinese should be the world's lingua franca, and these Westerners must first prove that they are Xuanyuan, and then they will not build any pyramids in Egypt, but directly build a Yellow Emperor Mausoleum or Yan Emperor Mausoleum in London or Paris suburbs, and then prove that they are the descendants of Yan and Huang. It doesn't make sense logically to humiliate us with an extinct civilization!
If the science and technology of the West are all because of the theft of missionaries, then in order to achieve scientific and technological achievements far beyond those of the West, is it necessary to have a deep scientific tradition? It should be that in the past, the imperial examination also tested advanced mathematics and physics, and it could not be the Four Books and Five Classics.
It is also impossible to have the loss of such technology, because the acquisition of such scientific and technological achievements has long shaped the worldview of our nation, and if science and technology are lost, civilization will also disappear. Uninterrupted history is the basic characteristic of Chinese civilization. 