What is disposable income?
Disposable income is the income that individuals can freely consume except for necessary expenses, including cash income and in-kind income. If the statistics are really carried out according to this literal meaning, then what is the basis for the statistics of the statistical office? Because as far as the people around me are concerned, they may not even be able to get into the lowest level.
Seeing this data, I was thinking about two things
First, the base number of data statistics is **Because in fact, if a person's income does not buy five insurances and one housing fund, it is difficult for the country to count, including the income of farmers, in fact, it is relatively scattered, at present, many domestic companies will not buy five insurances for employees, let alone provident fund, so whether this data is accurate, or is it self-deception.
Second, what is the significance of the release of similar data? It is clear that most people feel that they have not reached the lowest level, and there is no certainty about what disposable income means.
Whether the disposable income is earned so much or spent so much, five insurances and one housing fund need to be deducted
Counting the crowd is not convincing
The low-income group can't get in, it's the same situation
The whole network is full of rich people, and they all have money at their disposal
I also want to ask, who has dominated mine
If so, what is the significance of this data?
The validity of the data is indeed worth pondering
Literally rich, in fact poor, what is the point of this, causing comparison?
The average algorithm is not applicable to social production and life, and has no guiding value
500 pocket money per month, what level does it belong to, hahaha
According to this algorithm, how long can a house of 2 million be bought, whether it should be more concerned
Perhaps the original intention of data disclosure is to share the joy of economic development with the people, but happiness is not synchronized, some people are happy and some are worried, it will be better to care about the actual problems of people's livelihood, data is almost useless in the face of people's livelihood, and the hardships of the grassroots of society can not be reflected by data.
What do you think about this data? What gear are you in?