Recently, rumors about the complete abolition of the pooled area have aroused heated discussions in all walks of life. This news not only touched the heartstrings of countless families, but also caused waves in the real estate market. The most important concern of the public is undoubtedly whether the owners who have worked hard to buy a house can get due compensation in this policy adjustment. The answer to this question is directly related to the well-being of millions of families and the future of the entire real estate market.
Shared area, a term often used in real estate transactions, refers to the area of common facilities shared by owners in a residential complex, such as elevator shafts, stairwells, and fire escapes, in addition to private residences. The existence of this calculation means that when people buy a house marked as 100 square meters, the actual space available for private life is often less than expected at the time of purchase due to the need to deduct the shared area. This practice has planted the seeds of dissatisfaction and injustice in the hearts of many property owners. If the concept of shared area is abolished, it will undoubtedly be good news for the majority of owners. First of all, it means that they can save a considerable amount of money, because every square meter will become their real private space, which will undoubtedly greatly improve the value for money of the home. Secondly, the removal of the shared area policy is also likely to attract more potential home buyers to the market, thereby boosting the current relatively sluggish real estate market. Such a change can be said to be a shot in the arm for the entire industry.
However, for those owners who have already paid real money** to buy a property, they naturally hope to get some compensation in this policy adjustment. The official response of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development was: "Early purchasers have not lost their exclusive benefits, and their rights and interests should naturally be safeguarded." This response clarifies the principle that early homebuyers should be protected and that they should be compensated accordingly for this policy change. However, the establishment of a compensation mechanism is not an easy task. Given the sheer number of commercial property owners in China, finding a compensation package that is both fair and practical is a huge challenge for both ** and developers. For now, one possible solution is to compensate early home buyers through appropriate concessions in property taxes and effective coordination with developers. Although such a plan is complex, such efforts are necessary in order to protect the interests of the majority of owners.
From a broader perspective, the need for policy adjustment to abolish the shared area is self-evident. It not only helps to improve the transparency and fairness of the real estate market, but also improves the value for money of housing, so that consumers can get more tangible benefits. In the long run, the implementation of this policy will promote the development of the real estate market in a healthier and fairer direction. The example of Hong Kong has proven that the abolition of pooled area is a trend in the development of the industry, which indicates that China's reform in this area is also the general trend. In the process of promoting this policy, it is necessary to adopt a balanced strategy, which not only fully takes into account the interests of the market as a whole, but also does not ignore the legitimate rights and interests of those early home buyers.
Policymakers must plan carefully to ensure that the abolition of shared space is accompanied by a sense of fairness and justice for early home buyers, as well as the compensation they deserve. Only in this way can this policy be widely recognized by the society and truly achieve a win-win situation for the industry and society it aims to promote. In this process, the voice of every owner should be heard, and the interests of every family need to be protected. This is not only a question of policy fairness, but also a test of social justice and responsibility. With the continuous adjustment and improvement of policies, we have reason to believe that the real estate market will be healthier and fairer in the future, bringing more well-being to consumers.