Shared area from a civilian perspective.
It's hard to give up"Double-edged sword".
Pooled area for home buyers.
It is undoubtedly an existence that people love and hate.
Because to a certain extent, it ensures the construction and comfort of public facilities in the community;
It is because it often makes buyers feel "wronged" when they pay real money**.
Where should the shared area go?
From the point of view of the average home buyer.
The existence of the shared area does have its rationality.
No one wants to live in a neighborhood with no elevators, no corridors, and little greenery.
The existence of these public facilities.
It has undoubtedly enhanced our living experience.
When the area of these public facilities is counted towards our purchase area.
In the event that we are required to pay various expenses such as property fees, heating fees, and taxes.
We started to feel resentful.
What's even more difficult for buyers to accept is.
The income generated by the shared area is often not owned by the owner.
In accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code.
The income generated by the shared area shall go to the owner after deducting reasonable costs
In reality, this part of the income is often taken "quietly" by property companies or other managers.
This undoubtedly makes buyers feel that their rights and interests have been violated.
When someone proposed the "complete abolition" of the pooled area
Many homebuyers are supportive.
But is it really that simple to do away with pooled area?
Apparently not. The cost of the shared area needs to be borne by someone.
If the pooled area is cancelled.
Then the developer is likely to pass on this part of the cost to the area of the suite.
This results in a house price**.
After the cancellation of the pooled area.
How to calculate the property fee, heating fee and other expenses?
For those who have already bought a home.
They are more concerned about whether there will be compensation after the abolition of the pooled area.
Judging by the response of the state.
This is not very likely.
Because before the new regulations were introduced.
It is reasonable to charge the purchase price and strata fee corresponding to the shared area.
From a practical point of view.
It is also very difficult to compensate people who have already bought a home.
Can we just "swallow our anger" about the shared area?
We can start with the property fee.
Gradually promote reforms.
For example, the property management company can use the income of the community to offset the property fee.
Thus reducing the burden on home buyers.
The calculation of the purchase price can also be adjusted.
For example, 50% of the shared area is used to calculate the purchase price.
Although it is not realistic to cancel the pooled area in a short period of time.
However, in the long run, it is imperative to reform the shared area system.
Today's topic: Do you have any thoughts on this? Let's leave a message to discuss!
Disclaimer: Learn about the relevant events through relevant reports, only make personal comments and opinions, and do not represent others. If the content of the article is infringing, please contact us to delete or change it.