The U.S.-China Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement has expired, but China and the United States have still not been able to reach a consensus on extending the agreement. It's a complex game of technology and technology, and it's not just about small issues like clean energy, it's about a comprehensive model of cooperation between China and the United States in terms of technology and technology.
Since its signing in 1979, the agreement has become a symbol of cooperation between China and the United States in science and technology. However, in the process, the problems encountered in scientific and technological cooperation have also become increasingly exposed. Dennis. Simon noted that while China seeks greater collaboration, the United States is more inclined to focus on issues such as clean energy.
The U.S. and China have previously reached a number of agreements on a number of technologies, but the current stalemate shows that there is a growing gap between the two countries in science and technology cooperation. The United States wants to cooperate separately in certain regions, but this desire does not seem to be shaking China's overall level of science and technology.
At present, there is a serious "decoupling" and "broken chain" between China and the United States in terms of technology and technology, and this phenomenon has become a reality. Under the situation of Sino-US war and science and technology war, China's scientific and technological research and development capabilities have become more and more prominent, reflecting the strong characteristics of China's independent economic and technological system.
The U.S. strategy of "decoupling-de-crisis" with China has led to different trends in the process of technological iteration between China and the United States. In the world, there is a complex pattern of parallel coexistence, mutual confrontation and partial integration of China's science and technology system and that of the United States. This model has a good performance in communication technology and chip technology.
In terms of communications technology, the United States has exerted extreme pressure on other countries to ban Huawei's 5G mobile phones. When technology and product quality are relatively lagging behind, such policy measures are forced intervention in the market.
In terms of chips, the U.S. blockade of China's science and technology actually promotes the process of China's localization and independent chip research and development.
Due to the rise of 6G communication technology, the United States is still adhering to the "small wall" strategy in order to compete with China for the technical specifications of 6G in the competition of 6G. Since 5G technology is at a disadvantage, it remains to be further studied whether the United States can demonstrate real scientific and technological achievements and the strength of large-scale industrialization on 6G.
The development of science and technology is always based on actual scenarios, and perfect exploration is carried out on the basis of reality. The decline of the U.S. industrial structure has made it face China's disadvantages in terms of technological iteration and product competition. The future of the Sino-US agreement on scientific and technological cooperation is closely related to the trend of world scientific and technological development, and thus has attracted great attention from the international community.
What do you think about this, you can express your opinion in the comment area!
All of this site is **all** on the Internet, if it involves infringement, please inform us.