Behind the cancellation of agricultural Dazhai investment and income are not proportional, what is the biggest problem?
"The pay and the return are not commensurate.
From the 1960s to the 1970s, the agricultural Dazhai with self-reliance and hard work as the core was a distinctive feature of China's rural construction. However, with the rapid development of China's economy, "learning Dazhai" has gradually emerged in the development process of our country, which is also an important factor in the abolition of the "agricultural Dazhai" policy.
Agricultural Dazhai attaches too much importance to "image" and vigorously invests in various projects to show the achievements of rural modernization. However, due to the lack of scientific planning and economic evaluation, many major construction projects are often blindly carried out on an excessively large scale and with too high standards, resulting in a large amount of waste of resources and a large amount of manpower and material resources. For example, the utilization rate of the water conservancy facilities built is low, the maintenance is difficult, and some large-scale irrigation and drainage stations and water diversion projects will be scrapped due to insufficient power supply or water shortage after only one or more uses, resulting in a large amount of wasted investment.
On the other hand, a series of major projects due to the construction of agricultural Dazhai have not produced due economic benefits. For example, due to poor soil quality, poor irrigation conditions, and low yields, some places cannot completely solve the problem. In addition, the scale of some construction is too large, the maintenance cost is high, and the investment efficiency is unbalanced. The above problems hinder the application of the concept of "agricultural Dazhai" in practice.
Therefore, there is a serious contradiction between the "investment benefit" and the "benefit" of the implementation of the "three rural" policy. In rural construction in the new era, overemphasizing the "image project" is no longer suitable, and we must pay attention to economic development and sustainable development.
The relationship between the rural development pattern and the agricultural village is one of the main factors causing the withdrawal of the "agricultural village", and the change of the rural development pattern is one of the main factors.
Driven by the market economy, there has been considerable development in agricultural production, agricultural production, lifestyle, and agricultural production. At the same time, the production mode of peasant households has shifted from a simple "face project", "face project", and "face project" to "economic interests".
With the continuous change of the pattern of rural development, the development mode of "agricultural village" has become more and more unable to meet the actual needs. Farmers are increasingly focusing on economic benefits and sustainable development, and are less and less interested in large-scale construction projects with high investment and low returns. At the same time, rural economic development has gradually attached importance to sustainable development, from blindly pursuing the short-term effects of "face projects" to focusing more on improving agricultural production efficiency and increasing farmers' income.
There is more resistance to the "agricultural village".
In the process of implementing the strategy of "agricultural science Dazhai", some "excessive" practices have aroused the disgust of the majority of farmers. For example, excessive projects such as the construction of terraces and the digging of ditches in rural areas not only exhaust farmers physically and mentally, but also consume a lot of financial and human resources.
In the era of "agricultural Dazhai", in the process of rural construction of "Zhaizhai", there were many safety problems, resulting in personnel. As a result, farmers are disgusted by exaggerated slogans and are reluctant to passively participate in overwork. In addition, some construction investments are large and the returns are low, which makes farmers question the viability of "Xuedazhai".
Rural economic development in the new era of "returning farmland to forest" and "agricultural village".
In the 1980s, after a lot of research and discussion, we decided to abolish the "Agricultural Dazhai". However, the spirit of "Agricultural Dazhai" has always been rooted in the blood of the Chinese people, and the spirit of self-reliance and hard struggle is still inspiring the people to continue to move forward.
In the 80s of the last century, the development of China's rural economy mainly relied on agricultural labor. Every township and town should involve peasant households in the improvement of small watersheds and the construction of water conservancy infrastructure. However, compared with the previous times, the project pays more attention to scientific planning, economic benefits, and sustainable development, and strives to maximize the water conservancy infrastructure and economic benefits.
Abstract: Due to the disproportionate investment and returns, the agricultural science Dazhai was abolished. With the rapid development of China's economy and society, a new situation has emerged in China's rural construction, and farmers have begun to attach importance to economic growth and sustainable development, reducing the phenomena of "face project", "face project", "face project" and so on. At the same time, rural residents are increasingly resentful of the "agricultural village", and they are disgusted by the exaggerated propaganda slogans and actions.
However, the spirit of "agricultural science Dazhai" is still rooted in the blood of the Chinese, and the spirit of self-reliance and hard struggle will never be extinguished. In the new historical period, agricultural production is still the main body of agricultural production. However, compared with the past, it pays more attention to scientific planning, economic benefits, and sustainable development, with the goal of improving water conservancy construction and pursuing the greatest economic benefits.