For example, after the husband and wife get married, one party can sign a rental contract with their parents, and the rent will be set at a high level, and one day after the divorce, the rental contract will be auctioned, saying that this is the husband and wife living together, and the rent is a joint debt of the husband and wife.
This method is simple to operate, highly concealed, and the rent is very high over the years.
Because the contract is real, the house is also for your husband and wife to live in, and the house is owned by other parents, the law does not prohibit parents from renting the house to their children, some people say that there will always be running water if they continue to pay rent on a monthly or annual basis, once they find this kind of situation, they will stop immediately, but they have already thought about it, and the other party will most likely agree on a very high amount of liquidated damages in this lease contract, so they deliberately do not pay, and deliberately wait until the day of the divorce to shoot the contract. Not only do you have to bear the joint debts arising from the rent, but also claim against you along with liquidated damages.
Take 10,000 steps back and say, even if people fulfill the contract and pay, it is also a fair transfer of common property to parents, one party sees his wallet become deflated, there is no way at all, because people have a contract, the house is indeed the parents' house, and the husband and wife do live in it, which is not a malicious transfer.