Rewrite it in the style and content you provide:
According to our traditional values and ethics, Dink's thought was once regarded as anachronistic, and even regarded as a great shame of "cutting off children and grandchildren". However, in today's society, some people regard it as a symbol of fashion and freedom, and they do not hesitate to alienate their parents, and even make them regret it for life.
Hearing such a story, a couple decided to choose to live in Dink, and hid it from their parents. When the man's parents learned the news, they were shocked and angry. They communicated with the young couple many times and persuaded each other, but they were never able to change their decision. The man's parents spent three years in pain and helplessness, and finally his mother passed away in extreme grief. Even so, the couple held on to Dink's beliefs. They believe that it is their own private matter and that others have no right to interfere. They think that Dink has an easy life and cannot understand the expectations of their parents who want them to have children.
In desperation, the man's father gave them an ultimatum. He gave two choices: one was to give up Dink and have children, and he would leave all his fortune to them; The second is to continue Dink, but he will choose to remarry and have children, and the property will also be left to this child. The couple thought it was a lie made up by the father to force them to have a child, after all, the father was over 60 years old. However, two years later, the father sent them the news that he was married and had a son. Not only would he leave the property to the child, but he would also take back the property from them if they still insisted on Dink.
Faced with the reality of a significant reduction in wealth, the couple finally woke up and decided to give up Dink. When I read this story, I was deeply shocked. Some people even ignore their parents' feelings for the sake of their own "comfortable" life. They come from a well-to-do family, and there is no pressure to have multiple children. They are fertile, but resolutely reluctant to have children. Even the pleading of their parents could not shake their determination. Eventually, their mother's death became the end of their Dink path.
However, I don't think they genuinely repented, but out of concern that their father would leave his property to his younger brother. They are afraid that they will not get anything and will no longer be able to enjoy a "comfortable" life. When parents have only one child, they ignore their parents' feelings and violate human ethics, which is undoubtedly a sign of selfishness.
Western values advocate individual freedom, but ignore care for others and the rise and fall of nations. Under the influence of this kind of thinking, some people only care about their own "chic", ignoring the feelings of others, and even the life and death of their elders. They are obsessed with the Dink life and are unaware of the profound impact of this choice on society and family.
Take the couple in this story, for example, whose behavior is incomprehensible. Some people may think that this is their private matter, and others have no right to interfere. However, they use the wealth provided by their parents to pursue their own "freedom", which is contrary to the original intention of their parents to expect them to have children. If they were not dependent on their parents' wealth, but instead labored with their own hands, then there might still be a glimmer of understanding in Dink's life.
The Dink phenomenon is actually a product of Western deformed thought and culture, which has not stood the test of time. As I understand it, most people who choose Dink will eventually go back on it. However, by the time they realize this, they are often already missing out on the optimal age for childbearing. For women, this choice is particularly brutal. Because as they get older, men can regret and have children with younger women at any time, and women may lose the opportunity to have children forever.
Public figures such as Alan Tam and Kang Hui have also fallen into Dink's choice. Their eventual repentance may shed some light on them. If each family chooses to cut off their children, then where does the prosperity of the country and the nation come from? It is precisely because our nation knows the importance of inheritance that it can prosper forever. Therefore, we should cherish this heritage and let future generations continue to perpetuate our culture and values.