Some netizen Mao Xinghuo sued the writer Mo Yan to the court, accusing him of "allegedly smearing heroes and martyrs" and "allegedly beautifying the Japanese army invading China" in his works.
Hu Xijin is even more of a leader, fighting red, like a shrew playing on the street, in fact, Lao Hu's ability is also a shrew three times: one crying, two trouble, three hanging! This is not wrong to Lao Hu at all, for people with different opinions, Lao Hu's three-board axe is to buckle up the hat, denounce it as ultra-leftist, and oppose reform and opening up.
This time Mao Xinghuo sued Mo Yan, Hu Xijin sacrificed the virtue of a shrew, he did not refute whether Mao Xinghuo's lawsuit against Mo Yan was legal from a legal point of view, but from the perspective of exalting ideology, condescendingly labeled Mao Xinghuo: ultra-left and against reform and opening up.
He first labeled Mao Xinghuo as this: raising the banner of "political correctness", there is no problem in doing anything, and they have become an online demonstrator of "preferring the left to the right". Regardless of whether Mao Xinghuo's lawsuit was legal or not, he first labeled Mao Xinghuo an "ultra-leftist" and then began his ideological attack.
He accused Mao Xinghuo of "taking the matter to the Internet to hype, and about 10,000 people voted for it." This incident is a farce in which a few people use "beating Mo Yan" to hype themselves."
He scolded Mao Xinghuo for this kind of behavior, and said that Mao Xinghuo "The overwhelming opinion in the vote initiated was in favor of his prosecution?" Is this simply because our Internet is "diverse" and all sorts of bizarre things are somehow inclusive? ”
I would like to ask Hu Xijin: Is it true that the views of your right stick should be tolerated, and different opinions are all "ultra-left" and should be restricted? Lao Hu, the "Constitution" stipulates that citizens have the right to freedom of speech, you can oppose Mao Xinghuo's views, but you should respect Mao Xinghuo's freedom to speak, and Mao Xinghuo should be respected for his right to implement the law within the scope of the "Constitution".
You also said: "Lao Hu believes that these circumstances are obviously not conducive to creating a general environment for reform and opening up, and are not conducive to the formation of a relaxed atmosphere that matches the socialist market economy under the constitutional order, so the necessary changes are being more and more widely expected." ”
Lao Hu, you buttoned your hat too hard! Mao Xinghuo's lawsuit against Mo Yan is against reform and opening up? Why don't you say that Mao Xinghuo wants to subvert state power! Is your right stick so shameless?
This is the three-point claim on Mao Xinghuo's indictment, if you have the ability, you can come up with reasons to refute Mao Xinghuo's lawsuit, don't play tricks as soon as you come up!
This is "The People's Republic of China Heroes and Martyrs Protection**", do you think Mo Yan's works violate Articles 22 and 26 of the Heroes and Martyrs**? If not, state your reasons!
Convince people with reason, this is the professional quality of people! Are you a senior ** person, and you don't even have this quality?
Old Hu, shrews are very disgusting! Is that right?
Finally, I express my point of view: I resolutely support Mao Xinghuo's prosecution of Mo Yan! How can heroes be slandered! I only represent myself, not others.