The incident mentioned in the article is the Zhang Koukou murder case, which occurred in 2009. The cause of the case is that 22 years ago, Zhang Koukou's mother had an argument with her neighbors Wang Zhengjun and Wang Fujun and fought with him, and Wang Zhengjun hit Zhang Koukou's mother with a wooden stick, causing her mother to be seriously injured and died. Wang Zhengjun was sentenced to seven years in prison because he was under the age of 18 and was the result of fighting.
And in 2018, after Zhang Koukou recovered, he killed his neighbors Wang Zixin, Wang Xiaojun and Wang Zhengjun with a knife on February 15, and surrendered on the third day. He killed to avenge his mother.
Zhang Koukou's murder case has attracted huge attention and heated discussions on the Internet. Many ** referred to him as a "hero", emphasizing that he was avenging his mother. This report sparked a discussion on "revenge" and "justice" among the people, and received widespread attention.
Cases similar to the Zhang Koukou murder case are not uncommon. Historically, cases of blood revenge have been common. For example, the ancient Wu Song case is a similar example.
Wu Song is a character in the ancient Chinese ** "Water Margin", he killed the couple Pan Jinlian and Ximen Qing. Wu Song's murder was carried out through private court and finding people to testify, and he was finally sentenced to 40 strokes of the spine and 2,000 miles of stabbing.
There are certain similarities between this case and Zhang Koukou's case. Wu Song avenged his brother, but he did not do it directly, but achieved his goal by finding witnesses and setting up a private court. He first found evidence of Pan Jinlian and Ximenqing's adultery and poisoning Wuda, and then took the confessions of Wang Po and Pan Jinlian. With all the human and material evidence, he first killed Pan Jinlian, and then killed Ximenqing.
Both cases have aroused widespread concern and discussion in society. The culture of blood revenge has some support in traditional Chinese values. However, the sanction of the law remains. These two cases have aroused people's thinking about the "conflict between morality and law" and "legal justice and personal justice".
These cases have also raised questions about the impartiality and fairness of the judicial system and whether the outcome of the trial is in line with people's expectations. At the same time, these cases also raise the question of whether extrajudicial mercy should be provided for revenge.
The latest developments in these two cases are not mentioned in the article, and the details need to be further investigated and reported.
These two cases have aroused widespread concern and discussion in society. The conflict between the culture of blood revenge and the legal system has become a hot topic. The definition of justice and the relationship between morality and law have been reconsidered. These cases have also raised questions about the fairness and fairness of the judiciary and doubts about the fairness of the trial results.
For us, these two cases are not only a moral and ethical consideration, but also a test of the legal system. What we need to think about is how we should balance the relationship between individual justice and legal justice as a society, and how to ensure the fairness and impartiality of the law. These issues require in-depth discussion in order to be able to better build a just and equal society.