Delayed retirement will be changed to seniority retirement, and the views of teachers and graduate students are different. Let's take a look at the question and analyze the fairness in it.
Let's understand the concepts of delayed retirement and seniority retirement. Delaying retirement refers to postponing the retirement age, i.e., extending the number of years of service; Seniority retirement is based on the number of years of service, and you can enjoy retirement benefits when you reach a certain number of years of service.
Teachers agree with the view of retirement by seniority, which may be based on the following considerations. First of all, the number of years of service is more objective and fair as the basis for judging retirement. Whether it is the issue of aging or the issue of pension payment, it is not directly related to the age of the individual, but to the number of years of service and the individual's contribution to society. Second, compared to delayed retirement, seniority retirement may be more reasonable and appropriate for those who engage in heavy physical work, as they tend to have a decline in physical health as they age. Finally, retirement can also motivate people to work harder and improve their ability to work.
Graduate students argue that retirement is unfair. They may be based on the following considerations: First, there may be some unfairness in using years of service as the basis for retirement. For example, some people may not have enough years of work for various reasons, but in fact they may have reached the ability and conditions for retirement. Others may find other ways to increase their working years and get a well-deserved retirement benefit.
Years of service do not necessarily accurately reflect a person's contribution and ability to work. Some people may have achieved very outstanding results with a short number of years of service, while others have not achieved significant results after years of service. Finally, seniority retirement may also be unfair to those who want to enjoy their retirement sooner, while delayed retirement can meet their needs.
On this issue, I think the key is to balance the different interests and the principle of fairness. Both delayed retirement and seniority retirement have their reasonableness and fairness, and we should seek a compromise solution. For example, consider combining years of service and personal performance to determine the basis for retirement. In this way, the special circumstances of the individual can be taken into account, and the fairness of the whole can be guaranteed.
We should also be aware that the reform of the retirement system is a complex social issue, which requires comprehensive consideration of policy feasibility and social acceptability. ** and relevant departments should listen to the voices of all parties, conduct sufficient research and argumentation, in order to formulate a retirement policy that is in line with the actual situation and the wishes of the majority.
Finally, I encourage you to think more deeply about this issue. Please leave a comment below to share your views and thoughts. Together, we can learn how to better solve this problem in order to achieve the sustainable development of society and the happy life of individuals.