10 pieces of top wisdom, incisive!
1. The United States now often uses the banner of opposition to communism to occupy the places of its friends.
This is the positive and negative of purpose and causality, opposition to communism, this is the end, and then that purpose is transformed into cause and effect - in order to take the place of its friends.
By taking the end as the means and turning the purpose into the cause and effect, we can achieve both the positive and negative aspects of cause and effect, so that our actions can become healthy and become a reality.
This is also a kind of straightening with a curve.
2. There are two kinds of Chiang Kai-shek, one is Chiang Kai-shek who was on the mainland of Nanjing in the past, and the other is Chiang Zhongshi in the water.
This is the thinking of dividing Chiang Kai-shek into two, Chiang Kai-shek on the mainland and Chiang Kai-shek in the water, so that it is recognized that different strategies must be used to deal with him.
Instead of continuing to use the same tactics against Chiang Kai-shek on the mainland.
After splitting in two, I made myself more precise and increased my adaptability.
3. In my opinion, the United States is making a fuss about it as a topic in order to achieve their other goals, first of all, to occupy the middle ground from Japan to Britain.
This is the instrumentation of the end, and the purposefulness and causality constitute a set of pros and cons. One way to move from purposiveness to causality is to change the causality of one end to another. That is, the purpose is instrumental, means, and strategic.
The first hand and the second hand constitute a set of positive and negative sides, and according to the dialectic, there must always be a back hand (because only one side is unhealthy) - the means of the end constructs a back hand, and it is realized that there must always be a back hand.
4. History is calculated in units of a number of years, and cannot be based on momentary discussions, and cannot be listened to so much.
This is the positive and negative of the temporary and the long-term, and if this kind of temporary discussion is not permanent, then it cannot be taken as the basis and cannot be listened to so much.
In other words, there is only one side, so it is not healthy, so it cannot be listened to so much.
This statement seems contradictory to the principle of both listening and understanding. The difference between them is that: 1) Listening is relatively biased listening and biasing, and in essence, it also requires both positive and negative aspects.
2) Therefore, not being able to listen so much means that you cannot listen to so much if you are only on one side.
The essence of these two sentences is the same, that is, don't listen so much to the remarks of one side. Otherwise, it becomes biased.
5. Countries like ours, such as China and the Soviet Union, rely mainly on the domestic market, not on foreign markets. This is not to say that there is no need to contact abroad, not to do business, no, to be contacted, not to be isolated.
Who said that great men should not reform and open up? People ** us, not open to us; Thinks we are unqualified, does not recognize us. Great men are never isolated. It's just that we should be based on the domestic market and go to foreign markets.
6. We are not good at industry, agriculture, culture, and military at present, and the imperialists estimate that you only have a little something, so they come to bully us. They said, "How many atomic bombs do you have?" "But one of their estimates about us is miscalculated, and that is that China's potential power in the future will be amazing.
It is a bifurcated mindset that sees the present and connects to the future. Seeing the power of the present is linked to the potential of the future.
This division in two makes itself adaptable.
Bullying is being bullied because you have no ability to punish. Without the ability to punish, you can steal your history, steal your artifacts, and the easiest way is to be a punching bag, as a bargaining chip on the scale that can be placed on the left and right sides of the balance to balance it.
And with the ability to punish, it is possible to sit at the table, and not appear on the menu.
Punishment and reward make up a set of positives and negatives, so it is also necessary to have the ability to reward it, so that it is healthier. For example, the United States has both the ability to punish and reward, so it has become a world hegemon.
7. The bottom of the Communist Party is to give full play to all useful factors and destroy the obstacles.
At the bottom, it's the back hand again. The first move is this strategy, and the second hand is also this strategy. So, this strategy is extremely healthy.
This strategy includes a play factor, and a destructive factor. The useful, i.e., facilitating, facilitating, and hindering make up a set of pros and cons.
Exploitation, that is, support, support and destruction constitute a set of positive and negative. So, through the combination of two sets of heads and tails, a strategy is obtained.
A small group of people in the US authorities will rectify us at the first opportunity.
This was to be prepared for danger in times of peace, and at that time in a posture of total victory liberated the part of the continent of the whole country. It's a kind of thinking. Safety and danger constitute a set of positive and negative sides, which realizes both the positive and negative sides of safety and danger.
In the end, it is the people who decide the outcome of the war, to see who holds the **, to see what the fighters who have the ** think is most beneficial to them, to see who will fight, and the main thing is the first two.
That is, the control part of ** is the most important.
See who will fight, this is the possibility. Consider what is most beneficial to them, it is needed. Needs and possibilities form a set of pros and cons, and it can be seen that the part of need is the most important. Starting from the need, the possibility can be obtained.
* constitutes an environment, people and the environment constitute a set of positive and negative, it can be seen that relative to the environment, people are the most important. However, to get people, you have to start with the environment. To get the environment, you have to start with people.
In addition, there is a lesson learned. In both world wars, it was the defenders who won and the attackers who lost.
This is the difference between winning first and then losing and winning first and then winning, according to dialectics, defeat and victory constitute a set of positive and negative, so it is better to move from defeat to victory, that is, to defeat first and then win.
But according to the dialectic, the principle of starting from the positive, winning is positive, that is, starting from victory. For example, ** emphasizes that the prelude must be won.
Therefore, this sentence should describe a final state, so it can be amended to - the defender who is on the defensive and can go to the offensive will win in the end. And the attacker who is based on the offense, but cannot go on the defensive, ultimately loses. This is in line with the dialectic.
So, there are three strategies, 1) start with victory, (follow the principle of starting with heads).
2) From defeat to victory, (following the principle of moving from negative to positive).
3) It is to be invincible and then go to victory. (From the middle line of defeat and victory, starting to move towards the head).
And in actual execution, if you don't experience failure, then the first strategy and the third strategy will actually not be able to sustain.
Reading cured my mental exhaustion