Let's talk about "Removing the Three Evils Around the World" produced by one attitude
At noon today, a movie app popped up with the movie "Removing Three Evils Around the Week". Film and television commentary
Because I remember seeing the poster of this movie in the cinema, I opened it when my friend asked to see this movie.
The movie begins with the funeral of a gang boss. A killer named Gui Chai infiltrates the funeral gang and shoots a gangster to death amid a noise.
The detective next to him went after him, and during his fight with Guilin Tsai, one of the detectives suffered an eye injury and lost his sight.
Four years later, he accidentally learned that he had lung cancer and was about to die, and in order to make a name for himself, he killed a wanted criminal and his accomplices, rescued a coerced woman, and then went deep into a spiritual place according to the clues provided by the woman.
In a spiritual place, he inadvertently reveals a shocking secret. So he killed the Venerable and more than a dozen people in the spiritual place.
Although he was a good man in fighting violence, his actions involved indiscriminate killing of innocent people, which is not tolerated by modern law.
He chose to turn himself in.
During the medical examination in prison, I found out that I did not have lung cancer! Lung cancer is just a casual excuse from the doctor to persuade him to turn himself in, and it is also a way for the doctor with lung cancer to redeem himself.
At the end of the film, he is executed, and finally gets his own guilt and punishment.
This story is probably the same as the story of the ancient classical Chinese about getting rid of the beasts around!
A wicked man in the mouth of a multitude does not know it! thought that he would be loved by the people for eliminating violence and peace, but finally one day, it turned out that he was the biggest scourge in the mouths of the people! Knowing such a result, Zhou was ashamed and finally became a new person. But the ending of Guilinzai in this film is the death penalty, which is the result of modern law!
To be honest, the film is not very well made, and it should be a low-budget film: the story does not have much of the baggage of twists and turns, and it seems that some flaws can be seen.
If I were to rate him, he would probably only get 7 or 8 points!
Now this movie has sparked a new controversy, and it is said that someone has sued the director and producer for plagiarism!
Don't know what the final conclusion is? Let's wait and see.