Recently, there has been a lot of attention on the topic of whether the pooled area will be abolished. Will the shared area, a long-standing concept in the real estate industry, really retire from the stage of history? If the pooled area is really abolished, will those who have already bought a house be compensated? Today, we're going to take a look at this question.
We need to understand what a pooled area is. Shared area refers to the area of public parts and public facilities in a residential community or a building. These public areas and facilities include stairways, elevators, stairs, lobbies, fire escapes, etc. When calculating the area of the house, the shared area will be included in the area of each owner's house, so that each owner needs to pay the property fee, heating fee and other expenses for the shared area.
The existence of the shared area was originally for the rational allocation of public resources in the residential community, so that each owner could enjoy the convenience brought by public facilities. However, in practice, there are many problems with the shared area. For example, the method of calculating the pooled area is not transparent, leading owners to question the actual size and cost of the pooled area. In addition, the charging standard for the shared area is not uniform, and the cost of the shared area is higher in some places, which makes the owners feel unfair.
There have been calls for the abolition of shared areas and the introduction of a more transparent way of calculating the area of real estate. The abolition of the shared area means that the area of each owner's house will no longer include the shared area, and the owner only needs to pay the property fee, heating fee and other expenses for his actual use area. In this way, the owner will be more clear about the payment of the cost of the house, and will also be able to better monitor the quality of the service provided by the property company.
However, if the pooled area is abolished, will those who have already bought a house be compensated? There are many complex factors involved in this question. On the one hand, if the shared area is abolished, it means that the property area of the owner will be reduced, which will have an impact on the housing price. Some people who have already bought a home may feel that they have suffered a loss in the value of their property and should therefore be compensated. On the other hand, the abolition of the shared area may lead to an adjustment in the cost of the property, and the owner will need to pay more for the actual area used by the owner. This can be a big burden for some owners with more difficult financial conditions.
In this case, some measures may be taken to protect the rights and interests of those who have already bought a home. For example, a transition period can be set up to allow people who have already bought a home to have an adaptation period and gradually adapt to the new regulations after the abolition of the shared area. In addition, it is also possible to compensate those who have already bought a house to cover their losses. Of course, the specific compensation methods and standards need to be determined according to the actual situation.
To sum up: whether the shared area will be abolished, and whether those who have already bought a house will be compensated, is a complex question. To solve this problem, it is necessary to comprehensively consider various factors and balance the interests of all parties. In this process, it is necessary to play a leading role and formulate reasonable policies to protect the rights and interests of the majority of owners.
What is your opinion on whether the pooled area will be abolished? Do you think people who have already bought a house should be compensated? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss, share your views and experiences, and let us learn and grow together.