When teachers go to live broadcasts, they always have to weigh whether it will affect their main responsibilities and main business.
A teacher Tang from a school in Rongchang District, Chongqing, broadcast more than 100 live broadcasts in a month. Screenshot of the network.
Text|Chi Daohua.
According to the surging news report, recently, Mr. Zou, a citizen, reported to reporters that he found that a number of bloggers who claimed to be teachers sent students to attract fans, and these "teachers" broadcast live during work and accepted rewards for profit. Among them, a teacher Tang from a school in Rongchang District, Chongqing, broadcast more than 100 live broadcasts a month, "live broadcast as soon as class starts". In response, the staff of the Education and Health Commission of Rongchang District, Chongqing, responded that the situation was true and that the school had been instructed to ask the teacher to prohibit live broadcast during working hours. In addition, if you receive a tip from the student's parents, you will need to refund the fee. The staff member said that the school is a private school, and Mr. Tang is not a teacher on the job.
Teachers do live broadcasts, as long as the content is legal and compliant, it is okay. But the live broadcast to the state of indulging in this, or even "live broadcast as soon as the class is finished", obviously violates the requirements of the teacher's position. Moreover, sending students to attract fans is suspected of infringing on the portrait rights and privacy rights of minors, so that the profession of teacher with a certain social esteem status is completely ignored. Doing education shouldn't be so casual.
Teacher Tang broadcasts more than 100 live broadcasts a month, which means that he has an average of more than 3 live broadcasts a day, and Teacher Tang's live broadcast time is so frequent, and even live broadcast when he is in class, no wonder some netizens question his "heart is not in teaching". Doing live broadcasts without distractions can't help but make people wonder how much effort she can put into teaching, and how much energy she can care about students?
It should be made clear that the teacher's working time should not only be class time, but also the teacher's responsibility to prepare for lessons and correct homework. In reality, some teachers may have to work overtime to complete the work of preparation and auxiliary correction because of the heavy teaching tasks.
Therefore, a similar view that the blogger "Teacher Tang" thinks that "there is no live broadcast during work hours" after class is obviously untenable.
There is no conflict between the two professions of teacher and anchor. But when the teacher goes to do a live broadcast, he always has to weigh whether it will affect the main responsibility and main business. When a teacher is not busy with teaching, but always wants to "find another way" and earn extra money through live broadcasting, whether he is competent or not may become a problem.
The Code of Professional Ethics for Primary and Secondary School Teachers puts forward clear requirements for teachers' dedication to their jobs, "being highly responsible for their work, carefully preparing for classes, carefully correcting homework, and seriously tutoring students", etc., which is the professional ethics that teachers should have. The "seriousness" of the teacher's job naturally requires sufficient time and energy.
From this point of view, some people think that teachers who are addicted to live broadcasts are against teacher ethics and are not excessive.
Moreover, due to the particularity of the teacher's profession, how many of the fans in the live broadcast room are the parents of students, and how many of the rewards they receive are the result of the parents' gifts, which may only be known to the teachers themselves. This kind of delicate relationship that involves constant is supposed to be a teacher's initiative to clear up in a timely manner under the concept of home-school co-education. This is not only related to educational equity, but also affects the future of teachers themselves.
The Rongchang District Education and Health Commission's request for the teacher involved to "receive a reward from the student's parents and need to return the fee" is based on this consideration.
It should be recognized that as an emerging Internet application in the live broadcast industry, there may be more teachers, especially those in private schools, who will have the urge to use their spare time to enter the industry to test the waters.
In this regard, similar to not receiving tips from parents, not using work hours for live broadcasts, and not sending students at will, etc., it is necessary to have clear regulatory measures at a higher level to prevent campuses and students from becoming the "scenery" of some teachers' live broadcasts, so that serious education work can endorse Internet celebrities.
This is also something that bloggers as teachers need to be cautious about, and there is no problem in wanting to "have both", but if you cross the border, it is likely that the gains outweigh the losses.
Written by Beijing News commentator Chi Daohua.
Edited by Xu Qiuying.
Proofreading by Li Lijun.