In recent years, the conflict between the property and the owner has been deepening, and many owners have begun to call for the abolition of the property company, and many communities have really done it, and use the owners' committee to be responsible for the management of the community. 
Property services are provided and residents in the community pay reasonable property fees, which is originally a win-win thing, why is such a relationship so stiff? In my opinion, there are several main reasons for this. First, the property has too much power and is not subject to due restrictions, and even begins to be anti-customer-oriented. Logically speaking, the property is the party that provides services, and the spirit of service must be indispensable, but in the actual management process, many properties regard themselves as the owners of the community, not only shouting at the residents of the community, but also imposing many restrictions on the owners, such as cutting off the owner's water and electricity at every turn to force the owner to pay the property fee. To put it bluntly, most property companies now just regard the owners of the community as a tool to make money, and there is no sense of service, even if the owners are not satisfied, the property will not care. 
Second, the level of service management is getting worse and worse. Community greening, equipment maintenance, fire inspection, management of foreign personnel and other aspects are all responsible for the property, but more and more properties are actively collecting money, but when the real work is carried out, it is inefficient procrastination, many owners think that they are paying to invite back an uncle. From the reasons mentioned above, it is enough to see that the chaos in the property industry has seriously infringed on the rights and interests of property owners, as well as affected the normal operation of the community, so it is not surprising that more and more owners have called for the cancellation of properties in the past two years. 
So, will the property be cancelled or not? It is undeniable that the responsibilities of many properties are not in place, but for most owners, property still has a very important role, and many communities have also tried to cancel the property, and then manage the community with the owners' committee elected by the owners, but the result is very second-level differentiation. It is undeniable that the owners' committees elected by some communities are of high quality and have management experience, and after a short run-in, the community will be managed in an orderly manner, and the cost is far lower than the property fee. But there are still a few who can do this, and more communities have not become better after canceling the property, on the contrary, because of the lack of experience, the cost of various ruptures, the community has become a mess, and finally a new property is invited back. 
In this regard, Xinhua News Agency published "Property should not be a "powder keg" of the city" to express its own view: until a better alternative service is found, property still has its value and necessity. At present, most of the urban residential buildings are based on the community, and the community lives with so many people, and the necessary management is a necessity. 
Most of the residents of the community are usually busy with work or spending time with their families and children, and have little time and energy to manage the community. If a part of the fees from the community is set aside to pay the salaries of managers, then it will involve issues such as whether the management fees are reasonable, in short, this is a confused account. Therefore, there is still a need for the property to exist until there is no better alternative, but this does not mean that the property can act arbitrarily, and the owner should also take the initiative to play a supervisory role. 
According to the provisions of the Civil Code, the property must publicize the following three expenses, one of which is the income from the operation of the public area, such as the advertising fee of the elevator, which belongs to all the owners and can be used to supplement public maintenance**, or can be directly issued to the owners. Secondly, without the agreement of the contract and the consent of the Owners Committee, the price of the property shall not be increased without authorization; Finally, the document jointly issued by the previous 8 departments clearly stipulates that some miscellaneous fees are not required. 
With the gradual improvement of the relevant provisions of the Civil Code on property fees, the chaos of property charges will gradually decrease, and property owners will have more tools to supervise the behavior of properties. Kunpeng Project