After the live broadcast platform became popular, many anchors made money. Especially some anchors who have no ink on their chests and have a belly of straw bags make money quickly, which makes some people who focus on analyzing themselves envious, jealous and hateful. If they can also make such a big traffic, why do they have to analyze the road to fame and give guidance to others? So, why do the streamers with a belly of straw bale make money quickly?
The anchor with a belly of straw bags caters to the low-level tastes of some people, and it will quickly become popular. Whether it is pretending to be crazy and stupid, or daring to say anything, it has become the object of people's pursuit, and even just by having a star face, it can quickly become popular and increase millions of fans. It can be said that the live broadcast platform is mixed, and it is itself a platform for capital accumulation, asking people to attract traffic on it. There are many ways to attract traffic, and there are many anchors who can become popular by pretending to be stupid and eating and drinking. And with the knowledge of lectures, the people who attract traffic generally do not have too many fans, at least compared to those anchors who have a belly of straw bags, the number of fans is still too small. There is no lower limit for anchors with no knowledge and a belly of straw, they can make all kinds of funny jokes, and they can quickly attract traffic. After all, there are too many spectators wandering around the short ** platform. They are idle just to watch the excitement, they don't want to listen to lectures, they don't want to be educated, they just want to have fun and buy some bargains. As a result, the anchors with a belly of straw bales cater to this market need, will make people laugh during the live broadcast, and have to engage in unlimited operations and take the opportunity to sell goods.
Most of the people are spectators, just to see the excitement, and when they see their bottomless performances, they will like, follow, collect, reward, and buy goods. The anchor's various unrestricted operations are all for drainage, and at the same time sell goods and monetize traffic, which also achieves financial freedom. Many people who are engaged in live broadcasts can't become popular and can't make a lot of money, but the anchor with a belly of straw can quickly become popular on the whole network, does it show a certain problem? Of course, it can explain a certain problem. Capital has no bottom line, and it does not possess the attributes of good and evil. The purpose of capital is very direct, that is, to appreciate the value, and to do so at any time at its disposal. Capital has built a self-leading platform to ask people to engage in live broadcasts on it to drive traffic. Capital advocates flow, but also advocates flow realization. In other words, no matter what means are used, as long as it is not illegal, it is good to be able to drive traffic. This kind of evaluation standard has deviated far from the social evaluation standard, and society requires people to work hard and get rich through hard work, and cannot take advantage of the wrong way. However, the anchors can quickly become popular, and it is not a problem to earn one million a year, and some even earn more than 100 million a year and become the head anchor. It cannot be said that they did not put in the labor, but that they earned money too quickly, which made many people blush.
Especially after the Internet celebrities with a belly of straw bags make more money, people will ask, why are they? Even the idle people in the village started live broadcasts, pretending to be stupid and stunned, and actually made money quickly, is it a typical example of getting something for nothing? Of course not, but they have figured out the psychology of some viewers, or their live performances cater to the psychology of some viewers, attract a lot of attention, and make money. For a long time, people have been influenced by the mainstream ideology to believe that getting rich through serious work is the best and is recognized by society. However, the anchor with a belly of straw is popular, and there is no good content in the live broadcast, but he has millions of fans and makes a lot of money, does it make those who work hard look unpleasant? How much does a serious worker earn in a year? How much does a hard-working farmer earn in a year? How much does a straw bale anchor make in a year?
There is no harm if there is no comparison, the anchor makes money quickly, but does not pay too much labor, and the workers or farmers who pay too much labor themselves do not earn much money and cannot even support their families. Is there a deformity in the development? Yes, definitely. Real laborers don't make much, while speculators make a lot of money. Could this alone close the gap between the rich and the poor? Of course not, no matter how many anchors there are, it will not have a decisive impact on the economy. They just engage in some no-limit operations in order to sell goods, and after attracting traffic, they can monetize the traffic. But for the production link, the impact is not very large, and even has no good effect on market stability. Just imagine, people go to the live broadcast room to buy bargains, who will go to the physical store to buy things? In the long run, the brick-and-mortar store will really close its doors. The goods in the live broadcast room are sold very cheaply, most of them are the result of the anchor scanning the goods in major factories, but they are not the same as the things sold on the market.
People are accustomed to seeing mainstream ** reports, most of which are formal, official, secretive, and lifeless content, and when they see the content launched by the anchor with a belly of straw, they feel fresh, and they haven't seen it elsewhere, just like watching the animals in the circus perform, they feel curious, deeply attracted, and pay attention. And the anchor just caters to this mentality of people, and he dares to broadcast live unscrupulously. Most of the people who watch this kind of live broadcast have the meaning of anti-traditional and anti-mainstream**, and they want to see more possibilities, rather than just watching the excitement. It seems that these straw-bellied anchors have become clowns, and they have become counterparts of people's consciousness against orthodoxy, and they will win the attention of many people.
Of course, not everyone can become a straw bag anchor, only the anchor who is selected by the platform and does promotion will become a traffic anchor. And the anchor with a belly of straw bags can quickly get recommendations and increase millions of fans by virtue of being funny and looking like a star, is there something wrong with the rules of the platform? It's as if something is wrong with the system in a country, but no one admits it......