Is it really true to "accumulate thick and thin"?
As the saying goes, we are always taught: "If you read more than 10,000 books, you will write like a god", so if you read more than 10,000 books, can you really have divine help?
In fact, the essence of the question is: can quantitative change cause qualitative change?
Yes! But the key is how much "quantitative change" can cause "qualitative change"? How many books of poetry do you need to read to "write like a god"? Five volumes? Ten volumes? Or a hundred volumes?
No one can answer, it's not a question of "quantity".
Taking a step back, given a given number, how many people would be able to read these books consistently?
Human nature is lazy, if you need to pay for a long time in order to get a certain reward, then the process of pursuit will be extremely long and hard. This will put a lot of people off.
It is only when you get timely enjoyment and feedback that the brain will continue to be excited, which is the instinct of living beings.
The so-called enjoyment is often a "reward" outside the thing itself, such as watching TV after completing homework; The so-called feedback usually involves the thing itself, such as how many points can be scored for the completed homework, which question is answered correctly or incorrectly, and so on. If discussed, the two forms of influence are different, but they serve the same purpose.
That's why some bestsellers or the web** are idiomatic with paragraphs and short sentences. However, some textbook theories, due to their rigor, appear to be "smelly and long", which makes it difficult for people to "swallow". This is because short sentences have relatively little information, are easy to understand, and can make people get information in a timely manner and enjoy the "reward" brought by the "pay" of reading.
Since it is against nature to prolong the enjoyment time, why don't we take advantage of the trend, shorten the time, give feedback in time, and make good use of human instincts.
"Accumulation" is just a means, and "accumulation" is just a positive attitude, which is not suitable for the actual way of doing things.
A good approach should be to "accumulate and develop", and "accumulate and develop".
Timely learning, timely use, timely enjoyment and feedback can stimulate people's enthusiasm and motivation and form a virtuous circle.
Consciously establishing a reasonable feedback and enjoyment mechanism, and implementing it, is an important part of the cycle. If the formulation is unreasonable, "5 minutes of learning, half an hour of playing" is also inefficient. If it is not implemented effectively, the effect of correcting the problem on the spot and correcting it after three days is very different.
Only by knowing the laws of human nature and conforming to the laws of human nature can we make life easier and life happier.
end---
Image source network, invasion and deletion.
If you liked this article, welcomeFollow, comment, **