It is necessary to guide and encourage social forces to participate in the whole process of protection and utilization of low-level cultural relics protection and repair, inheritance and development of cultural relics through social welfare, full funding, and cooperation with others. "This year's two sessions, the National People's Congress, Yungang Research Institute President Hang Kan's suggestion is to build a leading and social forces to participate in the protection and utilization of low-level cultural relics of a new mechanism.
Last year, Hang Kan put forward a proposal on revising the part on the revitalization and utilization of Chinese objects in cultural relics preservation, which was highly valued by relevant departments. This year, the focus of his attention is still on the rational activation and utilization of cultural relics under the premise of protection first, and hopes to mobilize the strength of the whole society to gather a consensus on the protection and utilization of cultural relics.
At this stage, China implements a hierarchical management system for cultural relics, and the national and provincial cultural relics protection units are usually called "high-level cultural relics", and the municipal and county-level cultural relics protection units and ungraded immovable cultural relics are usually called "low-level cultural relics", and the number of low-level cultural relics accounts for a large proportion of the total number of cultural relics.
Taking Shanxi, a major province of cultural relics, as an example, Hang Kan introduced that the local government has approved and announced 531 national key cultural relics protection units, 779 provincial-level cultural relics protection units, and 11,731 city-level and county-level cultural relics protection units, and 76% of the immovable cultural relics have not been graded, and the total number of low-level cultural relics in the province has reached 97%.
For a long time, due to the influence of factors such as different responsible subjects, different funding policies, and different actual quantities, compared with 'high-level cultural relics', 'low-level cultural relics' are not only huge in number, but also have insufficient applicability policies. Hang Kan said.
Therefore, he suggested that the financial transfer payment, the transfer of common financial powers, the special transfer payment and the local general bonds, special bonds and other funds should be increased, and the rescue protection and full utilization of low-level cultural relics should be designated as one of the specific expenditure purposes, and a certain proportion of expenditure should be clarified, and the "cake" of the transfer payment of low-level cultural relics and general bonds should be made bigger.
At the same time, we will further improve the supporting system for public welfare donations, attract social forces to actively participate in the public welfare fundraising of public welfare non-profit institutions, open up the "last mile" of policy implementation, and promote the formation of a "leading system, social participation, and achievement sharing" pattern of cultural relics protection and utilization.