Structured group interview is a new form of interview based on structured interview, combined with group group interview, taking turns to answer questions, commenting on each other, and responding separately. 3 or 4 candidates enter the examination room at the same time for inspection, and the examiner will judge who is more suitable for the position. Mutual evaluation means that all candidates have finished answering the questions, and the candidates comment on each other and respond to the comments of other candidates. Each candidate comments are given 2-3 minutes, and each candidate responds for 1-2 minutes.
[Example Display].
A city implements a "face-to-face" approval service, but in the process of implementation, some departments force the masses to use online apps, express mailing materials or self-service terminals in the lobby. What do you think about this?
There is a problem
1.The response is inadequate and lacks substance. There is no substance in the response, the response is perfunctory, or the "questioning" of other candidates does not know how to respond, and the answer is not the question. Reviews are empty, disorderly, and lack of comprehensive thinking.
2.Being too modest exposes shortcomings. Candidates are worried that they are not humble enough, afraid of giving the examiner the impression that they are too strong, and accept all the questions pointed out by other candidates, but expose their own shortcomings, and eventually become "weak".
3.Unstable mentality, stiff response. It may be that it has a strong personality, and it will be eager to deny the negative evaluation of other candidates, giving people a feeling of not being humble enough, or even lacking team spirit.
How to respond] 1Unite and compete, and treat people politely. Listen to other candidates, pay attention to their own language tone, and uphold team spirit. When responding, don't just look down at your own records, look up appropriately, and pay attention to eye contact.
2.Seize the opportunity to fill in the gaps. Carefully and carefully match the missing content with the opponent's comments, and grasp the opportunity to answer the second time. You can give the other party some suggestions and better answers on the basis of the other party's supplement, or you can add some new points of view to answer more diversely.
3.Appropriate affirmation and strengthened analysis. Politely affirm each other's comments, and focus on highlighting their own analysis angles and conclusions, everyone looks at things from different angles, so they have different opinions. If the impact analysis of the review is not in place, you can thank the candidate for the advice given to me in advance, and it is true that you need to analyze the impact, but you also need to think as a public official, it is important to recognize the seriousness of the problem, but solving the problem is the key responsibility, and I also have the following additions about the impact.
4.Adjust your mindset and turn danger into relief. It is necessary to have a sense of competition and team spirit. Listen carefully to the other party's point of view, and if the other party's point of view is reasonable, further explain and supplement it on the basis of agreeing with the other party's point of view. For example, I thought after thinking that if I could. It will be better. If the other party's point of view is unreasonable, it should also be pointed out on the basis of modesty, because the other party's point of view has some truth, but it is an explanation for this issue. Point out your own opinion.
When responding to a structured group interview, you need to be humble and courteous, not humble or arrogant, and respond in light of the actual situation.