In the structured interview examination room, whether the content of the answer meets the examiner's expectations and whether it can attract the examiner not only depends on the quality of the content itself, but also has a logical output so that the examiner can understand. Next, we will give you a detailed analysis of the common logical problems and solutions of candidates in structured interviews.
1. Common logical problems
The logical questions in the candidates' answers include formal logic questions and internal logic questions, and their specific manifestations mainly include:
1) Problems of formal logic. For example, some candidates lack logic in the overall presentation of the answer form, do not have the habit of using logical words, and answer the content of a pot of porridge, and there are also cases where the use of logical words is chaotic or the use of routines will only use rigidly.
one, two, three"; There are also local logical problems, such as logical nesting, excessive stiffness of sections, etc.
2) Problems of internal logic. Most candidates answer the question by thinking of what to say, the logical main line is lacking, and the content is scattered; There is often a lack of clarity and hesitation in the order of solving problems, and there are too many things to be expressed, and the summary is not in place, which makes people hear in a fog; There are also examples in the answers that are not closely related to the topic of the question and the topic of the argument, are not targeted, and feel that the logic does not match.
Second, the logical problem solving countermeasures
1) The basic formation of the logic of overcoming in the early stage.
In formal logic, try to develop the habit of using logical words, and candidates can organize common formal logic expressions, such as "first, second, third, last......That.
First, its. Second, the third ......"On the one hand, on the other", etc.
In terms of content logic, it is recommended that candidates sort out the basic logic of various questions and establish a basic main line of answers. Learn some common content expression logic, such as subject analysis and analytic hierarchy process; In the problem solving question type, it is necessary to form a sense of the order of solving the problem, mainly to identify the problem, distinguish the priority and urgency, judge the order of solving the problem, or take the scene of the problem as a clue, substitute the scene, and quickly form an accurate judgment of the order.
2) Timely adjustment in the simulation training in the medium term.
In terms of formal logic, you can let others help intervene to interrupt, only listen to logical problems, interrupt in time once there is logical confusion, re-answer adjustment, or record the answer by yourself**, play back and review to find the logical problem and re-answer, or with the help of voice software, speech to text, analyze your own logic, and further improve.
In terms of internal logic, candidates can try to do logical training, choose different types of questions, limit 1 minute to think about the logical framework of the answer, and say the internal content level under the framework of each part of the question, and the language should be as short as possible to reflect the logic of thinking.
3) Logic improvement strategy in the later stage.
In terms of formal logic, you can specialize in outline writing training, include logical words in the outline, and try to draw a mind map for answering questions. After a period of training, it is necessary to pay attention to the commonality of the method and the individuality of the specific topic, combine the universal answering logic with the special question logic, and start from the topic itself, without the "framework" to solidify the specific topic.
In terms of internal logic, in view of the problem of detaching the topic from the topic, it is necessary to realize that the example is only an auxiliary means, a way of argumentation, and after giving the example, it is necessary to use some summary content to connect with the topic, and the candidate can try to accumulate multiple case materials on the same topic; If the description of the example is too long, a descriptive model (such as the "star" model) can be used, and generally speaking, it is sufficient to present the main performance and impact of the event; For problems that are out of touch with the content of the topic, you can summarize and accumulate some common topics of connecting words, such as youth topics and cultural hot spots, you can try to formulate your own topics, list idioms, examples, etc. around the topic.
Candidates should first clarify whether they have logical problems, specific problem performance, etc., and conduct targeted training, so that logic can bless their answers and improve their interview scores.