The headline of the latest issue of Der Spiegel is a bit scary, with Trump pointing at the Germans and scolding on the cover, with a text"I Won't Protect You".
After tasting Trump 1After the taste of the 0 version, all of Europe is afraid of Trump 20 on the line.
According to reports, Germany has seriously considered the possession of an atomic bomb, and Germany believes that in the current unpredictable international situation, possession of an atomic bomb is the fastest and least costly way to protect itself.
Why did the Germans seriously consider the atomic bomb? Because what Trump said, it really scared them.
In his latest campaign speech, Trump said: "The NATO Secretary General asked him, if Europe did not pay, would the United States protect Europe?" ”
Trump replied in the affirmative: "I will not protect you."
Even more ruthlessly, Trump went on to say, "Not only will I not protect you, but I will encourage Russia to do whatever they want." ”
That's why there was the cover article of Der Spiegel, "I Won't Protect You", which also launched Germany's plan for the atomic bomb.
To be honest, Trump's words are a bit exaggerated, he doesn't protect without paying, and instead of protecting, he encourages Russia to fight Europe.
When the first army is sent to Poland, Europe will be forced to pay a lot of protection money to the United States.
Although the United States benefited from the "European War" in World War I and World War II, Trump was the only one who blatantly said that "Russia will rely on Europe to blackmail European money".
The United States has fattened itself by relying on self-respect, and it has also made it clear to Europe that the so-called NATO's commitment to freedom and security is nothing more than a contract signed with a security company.
With money, you're safe.
Without money, you are in danger.
Not to mention that if Trump does come to power for the second time, his isolationism 20, it must be sharper than last time, and it will put all of Europe in a panic.
During the Munich Security Conference, US Deputy Harris hurried back to make up for it, saying on the first day of the meeting: The United States is unswerving in its sacred commitment to NATO.
As soon as any member of NATO is attacked, the whole of NATO will automatically declare war on it.
But Harris's remarks did not blow away the pessimism throughout Munich, and everyone knew that what Trump said was true, and what Harris said was also true.
Trump came to power, and if he doesn't give money, he won't protect Europe.
Biden is re-elected, and if he does not give money, he will also protect Europe.
But the problem is the best result of delivering the safety of one's own country to the United States.
Putting "one's own safety and life" on such a highly uncertain thing makes people with brains feel unreliable.
At the Munich Security Conference, Dutch Prime Minister Rutte, who is also a popular candidate for the next NATO secretary general, made it straightforward.
Rutte said: "You guys just stop scolding Trump, what's wrong with him?" What he said is the truth, we Europeans are just too stupid or naïve, we used to completely throw security issues at the Americans, this is a fact, what Trump said is also a fact, what right do we have to scold him? ”
The point now is not to scold Trump, nor to pray to God not to let Trump be elected, we can't decide whether Trump should be elected or not, that's an American business, and I'm not an American."
What Europe needs to do now is, first, to stop scolding Trump, and second, to strengthen armaments, increase military spending, increase investment in military production, and increase military cooperation between countries. ”
It doesn't matter whether Trump comes back or not, and we even have to thank Trump for coming back, because his return will lead to a truly independent European standing. ”
Dutch Prime Minister Rutte's words were endorsed by France's Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz.
"Europe's security cannot depend on the United States, only on Europe's sovereignty and strategic autonomy, and we will accelerate our actions in the new year," Macron said
In the European Parliament, a plan for Europe's own nuclear deterrence has been put on the agenda, which is a European-independent nuclear umbrella plan, that is, to expand Europe's nuclear weapons stockpile.
Europe now has a trilateral nuclear arsenal, the United States in Europe, and the United Kingdom and France in their own countries.
The core of the plan is that European nuclear-armed countries provide non-nuclear countries with a "nuclear umbrella", for example, if Russia drops an atomic bomb on Poland, then Poland, which has a nuclear umbrella, can make France return nuclear weapons to **.
That's probably the plan.
But the first step in this plan is to reduce the number of nuclear warheads deployed by the United States in Europe, and at the same time increase the deployment of nuclear warheads by Britain and France in Europe.
Although this "European Autonomous Nuclear Umbrella Program" is being discussed, it is difficult to realize just by sounding like this, how to drive American nuclear warheads out of Europe in the first place?
Secondly, Britain and France will increase the number of nuclear warheads and increase the scale of nuclear weapons maintenance, who will pay for this large amount of money?
Then Britain has already left the European Union, and it is completely out of the EU system, and it is impossible for Britain to participate in a European nuclear umbrella program that endangers the interests of the United States.
Then we can only rely on France, but can France support it? If nothing else, France will not even be able to break through the limits of the United Nations Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
It's hard to imagine that France will one day dare to say that I am not complying with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and that I am going to deploy nuclear weapons to European countries.
Therefore, the difficulty of "Europe building a nuclear umbrella" is much more difficult than that of European countries having their own nuclear weapons, for example, Germany makes its own nuclear weapons and protects itself, and Poland also has to build its own nuclear weapons and protect itself.
But in this way, Europe will inevitably face a nuclear chaos and become a high-risk area of nuclear war.
But in any case, from the Munich Security Conference and the various expressions of Europe, we can clearly see that Europe is really afraid.
What Europe is most afraid of is not Russia, but the United States.
They are really afraid that Trump will come to power, and they are really afraid that the United States will not protect them, so they are quite in a state of "rushing to the doctor", and even the exaggerated "European nuclear umbrella plan" is being discussed seriously.
And Europe's fear of the United States is actually good for China.
The greater the rift between the United States and Europe, the more room China has to maneuver.
This is also why we have seen a lot of actions by Minister Wang Yi at this "Mu'an meeting".
For Europe, the biggest demand for the United States is security protection, and now the United States' commitment to security protection is becoming less and less firm, and Trump even encourages Russia to fight Europe, so why does Europe still cooperate with the United States' global strategy everywhere?
In the past, Europe supported whoever the United States wanted to contain and sanction, and even if it was not in Europe's interests, it had to bow its head because of its dependence on the United States for security.
In the future, if the United States really does not provide security protection, and Europe's greatest demand for the United States is gone, then Europe will certainly no longer obey the United States.
Europe will begin to prioritize its own national interests, and when it comes to encircling China, Europe will think that this is not in its own interests, and if it does not, there is no need to cooperate with the United States.
After all, it was the United States that abandoned its security commitments to Europe in the first place.
The farther Europe is from the United States on security issues, the less the United States will be able to fully control Europe, and the more neutral Europe will become, which is beneficial to China.
What's more, Blinken also spoke bluntly at this "Mu'an meeting".
"In the international system, if you're not at the table, you're on the menu," Blinken said. ”
He expressed the truth of the international community's law of the jungle, which is inconsistent with the value of freedom and equality that the United States has always proclaimed. Do small countries have to choose sides?
So is Europe, or the European Union, "on the table" or "on the menu"?
The EU should also begin to realize that the "EU" should be sitting at the table according to its strength, but it has been suppressed by the United States for many years and has always been "on the menu" of the United States, and the EU itself seriously lacks autonomy, which has led to the United States being slaughtered.
That's why Holland Rutte said, "We have to deal with anyone, including China."
Only when we are strong and do not obey the words of any country can we avoid the fate of being on the "menu".
China has also fully grasped the atmosphere of fear in Europe at this meeting, and has actively launched diplomatic moves against Europe, even those who have been unfriendly to China in the past.
For example, I met with Baerbock, the old aunt of the Green Party, who was particularly aggressive towards China before.
For example, the meeting with French Foreign Minister Céjourne.
For example, the meeting with Polish Foreign Minister Sikorski.
For example, the meeting with Spanish Foreign Minister Alvarez.
At the meeting, China has frequently held meetings with many countries, and its attitude is actually very clear, and the message is that "China has always been ready to welcome Europe, which is at odds with the United States, to carry out more cooperation with us."
If Trump is really unfortunate enough to come to power in 2024, China will definitely launch a series of diplomatic offensives against Europe.
Because freeing Europe from the "cage" of the United States is "very important" for China's diplomatic strategic expansion
Follow me and keep you updated.