Huawei Hongmeng has become the only domestic self developed system!

Mondo Technology Updated on 2024-03-07

"Huawei Hongmeng has become the only domestic self-developed system! "!

Despite the small number of users and low visibility, many of whom are only familiar with iOS and Android for iPhones, and Windows, Linux, and macOS for PCs, the reality is that there are many operating systems in China.

Take mobile phones as an example, there are Huawei's HarmonyOS, SurgeOS, Flyme, ColorOS, and MagicOS. When it comes to PCs, there are also many, such as UOS, Deepin, New Fulcrum, OLA, Kirin, and CMB.

However, this system, so to speak, is not black, nor blown, it is really a 100% self-developed system, in fact, it is the only Huawei Red Devil system in China, whether it is on a mobile phone or a computer.

Other systems that are not 100% independently researched are based on other people's kernels, open source systems, etc., and are secondary developments, not pure independent research.

The phone is based on Huawei's HarmonyOS plus Android's AOSP (an open-source Android project) and has made changes to other systems, and it is understood that the same is true of Xiaomi's Surge OS, which cannot be considered 100% independent research.

Of course, the current Huawei HarmonyOS is not yet 100% self-developed, because it uses a lot of AOSP ** to be fully compatible with Android APP, but Huawei HarmonyOS Next will be launched, it will be 100% self-developed, but Huawei HarmonyOS Next will be launched, it will be 100% self-developed, no longer use AOSP ** only use its own HarmonyOS environment.

To say that the computer is running on the PC version of the HarmonyOS system, in addition to everything is relatively clear, it can be said that it is 100% independent research, and the other operating systems are almost secondary, such as Huawei, which is used for the server system ORA based on Linux development, and it is the same.

Everyone is developing on top of a commercial or community distribution with Linux at its core.

Of course, you can't say that Linux-based development is bad, 100% in-house development is good.

If you want to build on the original core, you can work in the original ecosystem without having to build the ecosystem from scratch on a specific foundation. If you want to do 100% original research, you can't work in the original ecosystem, you have to build the ecosystem from scratch.

As a result, leading manufacturers make decisions that they think are best based on their strengths, patterns, and capabilities when developing their own systems.

All systems look at development, and ultimately look at users, only what system development needs is a good system, and system development can not reach 100% self-exploration, no matter what.

Related Pages