Become a veteran reader of Thousands of Miles Floating:Click on the menu bar in the upper right corner of the upper right corner to set it as a star, and readers on other platforms should pay attention to the "Floating Thousands of Miles" high-quality author list
The fact that a teacher hits a student on the news is news in itself, and it is too common for a teacher to hit a student, and it has always been acquiesced in before, and few people feel that there is anything wrong with this matter, because teachers are naturally given the power to beat students.
This kind of power is the parents, when the parents send their children to school, they will basically say to the teacher with good words: please bother to manage my child, this child is more naughty, if there is a disobedient place, you can just hit it, after the beating, I will thank you again with the child's father.
Readers who are a little older should be familiar with this kind of talk, and it is likely that many people have heard their parents say this to their teachers.
The reasons for this phenomenon are complex, including the lack of parental education methods, the complexity of teacher management, and even more the problem of education models.
In the past, most of the parents were workers and peasants with low educational qualifications, and those who went to high school were considered intellectuals, and most of them only studied in primary and junior high schools, and they had no confidence in education. Parents who have no confidence in education, but hope that their children will become Chan can only pin their hopes on the teachers in the school.
To ask for a nobleman, you have to have a demanding attitude, you have to lower your posture, and fully give the teacher the right to educate your own children, whether it is corporal punishment or scolding, it is the teacher's right.
When we were in elementary and junior high school, the teacher usually brought a small wicker or ruler to class, which could either point to the content on the blackboard and act as a laser pointer today, or it was used to hit disobedient students.
Of course, most of the time they just beat the palm of their hands, and they don't pull their hair and smash it on the table, and most teachers have this sense of proportion. In the hearts of parents, beating their children is at most a beating of the palm, punishment of standing, punishment of running, etc., and there will be no problems.
From the teacher's point of view, there are dozens of people in a class, there are quiet students and naughty students, how do you care?
On the one hand, being a teacher is a job, teachers are also people, and teachers also have to support their families. It is a mistake to use a profession to raise the standard of personal qualities, and it is even more difficult to meet everyone's expectations by imposing such moral requirements on people who are not willing to take on them.
On the other hand, a teacher naturally has to take on more responsibilities, and there is more pressure on a teacher than to be an HR or an administrative clerk, and the teacher is responsible for any student who has a problem. While worrying about safety and health issues, you also have to worry about students' grades, if the promotion rate is not good, your reputation is not good, it is difficult to get promoted and raised, and it is difficult to explain to the parents of students.
Under this complex psychology, the best choice for most teachers is to "guarantee the bottom", that is, to strictly manage the school and manage the complex composition of students with constraints rather than guidance.
Just right, parents really gave the power of strict control to teachers, so they hit it off, and everyone formed a consensus, beat the children, beat the children, as long as the majority of the students' grades can be better, then even if your teaching methods are good, even if you are a good teacher.
Judging from the way we educate, the purpose of sending children to study has only two basic purposes, one is to improve the basic quality of the people, and the other is to let the people indulge in reading and not to mess around.
Under this premise, it is a good way to manage children in captivity, and you can see the clues from the word "put" after school, and the word "up" is used to go to school, and when you get out of school, it is not out of school, but after school.
What is called "release", being released from prison is called "release", being released by kidnappers is also called "release", and herding cattle is also called "release", the school itself has a restrictive nature, and coming out of school is called "release".
Corporal punishment itself is a kind of constraint, and from feudal society to decades after liberation, corporal punishment has always been tacitly accepted as a form of education. The education system is largely inseparable from corporal punishment, and it is only in recent years that corporal punishment has begun to be criticized.
This is indeed a kind of ideological progress, but only the ideological progress has not been improved, the teaching method has not been improved, the education system has not kept up with the pace, the ability of teachers has not been greatly improved, and the quality and ability of students' parents have not been improved.
Education is very complicated, parents should bear 80% of the responsibility for education, teachers should only bear 20% at most, the basic quality and ability of parents are good enough, children are more likely to be successful. Teachers are unlikely to teach students to be Einstein if parents don't do much.
My wife used to jokingly say that she wanted the child to become a gentleman in the future. What I replied was, you look at my ruffian, is there a high probability that a child will become a gentleman?
Parents do not need and should not expect what kind of person their children will become, and all the expectations of parents are a burden on their children. What kind of people parents are, what kind of people children will most likely become.
Children will not be beaten, nor will they be scolded.
What a child is like, parents can only accept it calmly, encourage their children, and make their children healthy and happy. On the premise that parents can accept this, they can reach a consensus with the teacher that the child's primary school to high school is mainly happy, supplemented by learning, so corporal punishment is naturally unnecessary.
If you want to learn, then you can learn, and if you don't want to learn, you don't have to be reluctant, everyone's ideas, talents, and interests are not necessarily the same. How many writers only have Chinese at the beginning of primary school, don't they also make a fortune? How many entrepreneurs only have junior high school Chinese, don't they also earn money?
end - Follow me to take you to insight into human nature, see through the laws of life, and face life calmly.