According to a number of reports from the global network and many others, Macron's "troop dispatch theory" in France has now caused huge controversy. But German Chancellor Scholz is now beginning to expose Britain and begin to betray Britain, saying that Britain has long had ground combat troops in Ukraine.
The reason why the "Storm Shadow" missiles hit the bridge in the Black Sea region, hit the landing ships so accurately, and hit the Black Sea headquarters with the help of the British. Without the help of the British, it would not have been possible for this missile to achieve such good hit accuracy and striking effect.
The Western alliance is also tearing each other down, and it is also warning other member states to coordinate their relations through whistleblowing, and if they are not coordinated, something big will happen. If Russia hears it, it is estimated that Russia will definitely point the spearhead of hatred at Britain again. Britain is ahead of the United States in terms of Russian strategic strike targets, especially in the list of nuclear strikes, hitting London first and then Washington.
Judging from the state of "too many lice to bite", Britain has long been the target of public criticism and the number one target of Russia. If Germany throws the pot at Britain, it is clear that it has its own intentions. Scholz stressed that I will never provide Ukraine with a "Taurus" with a range of 500 km, which is farther and harder than the "Storm Shadow". If he really goes to hit the bridge, Zelensky's 2024 goal may be achieved.
If the bridge is really hit with "Taurus", how will Russian Putin view Germany is a big question. Who blew up the "Nord Stream" pipeline now, everyone knows. Now Germany's aid to Ukraine seems to be a little weak, and the confrontation with Russia is even more empty.
Judging from the responsibility of "pig teammates", he wants to make the current hatred on the British a little more, and it is possible for him to be more relaxed. Now, Britain and other countries have engaged in several big camps, you see that now it is in the first place, and Russia must fight Britain. Now Macron is starting to compete again, and that has become Russia's second biggest target.
If Germany gives money and then equipment, and hides far away, its attitude is sometimes good and sometimes bad, and it may become a third batch of targets ignored by Russia. Schultz's remark is also very clear. If more Western countries, combat units enter Ukraine, then it is inevitable to achieve results, and at the same time warn Russia that I have no soldiers to fight in Ukraine, I only have some ** equipment.
Although the Leopard-2 tanks have been completely destroyed by you, I have no soldiers in combat operations. If it were really my soldiers, driving my "Leopard 2" tank, they might not have been able to have such a bad result. As American spokesman Pierre said, why the M1 tank was destroyed, because it was the Ukrainians who drove the tanks, not the Americans. If the Americans had driven this tank, it would not have been destroyed, and they would have achieved significant results.
There are many arguments about this kind of stealing beams and changing pillars, but Western countries are now very different in temperature when sending troops to Ukraine. Although Macron said that he had made such a decision after careful consideration, many countries did not buy it now. Although some countries have secretly sent it, they are now afraid of being exposed, and it seems that Scholz is also very polite, and by exposing others and stimulating the hatred of these people and Russia, he will probably reduce his pressure a little.
The Russian-Ukrainian conflict will end one day, and how these countries will face Russia after the end is a big question. In the next step, in the post-Russia-Ukraine conflict era, the relationship between Europe and Russia will develop in which direction it will be a big question. Some people say that 2024 may really not be able to move, what if it really can't be moved? Let's talk! Isn't it just stopping after the talks, and is there still a relationship to develop after the stopping?
If there are really signs of a ceasefire in 2024, these countries have given money and things before, and the countries that are crazy about supporting Ukraine, how to negotiate with Russia in the next step, this is a big question. Now that many countries are leaving a way out, Schultz exposed his hardcore ally Britain at a critical moment, which shows that people are also building a buffer zone, and once the post-conflict era comes, then people have a lot of ideas of their own.
For this, many countries should learn from it and blindly support Ukraine in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and it is possible that in the future, they will form a huge hatred with Russia.